Employers Who Provide Cell Numbers to Candidates Angry Candidates Used Those Numbers
One of the best writers for the Wall Street Journal is Sarah Needleman. She writes a lot about employment-related issues and many of those focus on issues related to college students searching for internships and recent graduates hunting for entry level jobs. Yesterday's article was a beauty but surely read very differently to different readers. Perhaps that was the intent.
Sarah interviewed a number of employers and candidates about the emerging trend of college students and recent graduates using cell phone text messaging (SMS) abbreviations such as "thx" for "thanks" and "4u" for "for you" in their thank you letters and other correspondence to prospective employers and after they've been hired. Not surprisingly, the employers felt that such abbreviations were terrible while most of the students and recent grads understood that the employers didn't like it but also felt that those attitudes were dated.
Now I can understand why an employer wouldn't appreciate receiving a text message full of informal abbreviations as the employer would likely suspect that the candidate would then use the same types of abbreviations when communicating with clients and if the clients aren't likely to appreciate the abbreviations then the use of them will hurt the employer's business. But I was flabbergasted by a couple of the dislikes:
- Executive recruiter Hal Reiter of Herbert Mines Associates, a New York-based search firm, discussed how awful it was for a candidate to send to him a thank you note within minutes of the interview. The candidate's sin? Sending it from his BlackBerry. Apparently Reiter doesn't process as quickly the candidate and therefore the candidate, according to Reiter, exhibited poor judgment. Please. If the candidate had waited too long that probably would have been a sin as well. Just because Reiter doesn't seem comfortable using technology to make himself more productive and responsive should he disqualify a candidate from the hiring process because the candidate's skills in those areas are better?
- Hiring manager Cathy Chin of ReThink Rewards, a Toronto-based marketing firm, felt that her personal space was infringed upon by a candidate who had the audacity to send a text message to Cathy's cell phone. A little background is in order. Cathy's cell phone number is on her business card and she gave the candidate her card. No mention in the article about Cathy instructing the candidate on how to communicate with her so it seems to be a reasonable assumption that Cathy did not tell the candidate that she'd prefer not to be called or texted. And how does a call or text to a cell phone number printed on your work card infringe on your personal space? Doesn't printing the phone number on your business card indicate that it is a business line? And if Cathy didn't want to receive text messages then why didn't she have her cell phone carrier turn that feature off? Or is that Cathy wants to be able to send and receive text messages but only personal ones? If that's the case, was it reasonable for her to expect the candidate to somehow magically know that? What ESP a stated requirement or even a preference for the position?
















