« June 2006 | Main | August 2006 »

One of my favorite foods has always been Jello, especially when cut up in squares. Yum. And one of my favorite partners (yes, this is an announcement of a new partnership) is RecruiTV by Wetjello. They're enabling employers who post jobs to CollegeRecruiter.com to move beyond text only postings to multimedia postings complete with streaming video. Several clients have already gone live. They're excited. So are we. And I am sure that the candidates will be as well.

It is widely believed that 90 percent of candidates apply only to advertised job openings even though only 10 percent of job openings are advertised. Logically, if you're looking for a job, you're going to do whatever you can to put yourself in the group of 10 percent of the candidates who are applying to the 90 percent of job openings even though those openings are unadvertised. But how do you do that? Networking tactics such as informational interviewing are great approaches, but I just learned about another.

Create a blog specifically about the organization for which you wish to work and the work that you would do for them. Can't possibly work? Wrong. C.M. Russell just wrote about Carolynn Duncan of Provo, Utah who did just that. Carolynn wanted a job with Provo Labs so created a blog that outlined why she wanted to work for them but, more importantly, why they should hire her. Awesome.

Fortune just published a list of the five best companies to intern for. Not surprisingly, they all offer their interns real world experience and treat them with a great deal of respect. Do the employers do so because they're nice people? No. I'm sure that most of the people who manage the internship programs for these employers are nice people, but the reason that they provide such a great experience for their interns is that they understand that an internship program is only successful if the employer converts (hires) the interns as permanent employees upon graduation. So which employers offer the best internship experience? What are the top five internships?

  1. Microsoft
  2. Northwestern Mutual Financial
  3. The Academy of Television Arts and Sciences
  4. Enterprise Rent-A-Car
  5. Deloitte & Touche

This post to Introduce David Gordon is part of an ongoing series of profiles of people who write for CollegeRecruiter.com through our blogs , articles, or our Ask the Experts questions and answers.

David Gordon is the Director of Internship Studies in the Marketing Communication Department at Columbia College Chicago, a college of 10,000 students. He has held senior marketing and general management positions on both the client and agency sides in the consumer products, business to business and entertainment industries and was president of his own execuitve search firm. At Columbia, dave developed the curriculum for the innovative course, Marketing Yourself, Job Hunting Skills For The Rest Of Your Life, the subject of a nationaly syndicated Chicago Tribune article.The course is now a core requirement for students in the Marketing Communication Department.

He has been a lecturer and counselor of both students and executives, on the job search process for over 15 years. Dave has been a contributing writer to the Wall Street Journal's National Business Employment Weekly, The Journal of the National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE), College Recruiter.com and Career magazine. He has also been a speaker at two NACE annual conference and a number of colleges in the Chicago area. Dave has an M.B.A. from Columbia University Graduate School of Business and a B.A. in Economics from Wesleyan University.

Learn more about David through his CollegeRecruiter.com Biography.

CollegeRecruiter.com just released another free white paper. This new white paper outlines the best practices for internship programs. It walks readers through the 12 points which are necessary for employers to create successful internship and co-op programs. Employers who follow these best practices will see significantly more of their interns convert into permanent employees and those employees will eventually turn into the next generation of leaders. Successful internship and co-op programs are not about saving money in the short-term by paying the students less money than permanent employees. Rather, successful programs are all about the recruitment of stars into permanent roles within their organizations.

This post to Introduce Rachel Moeller is part of an ongoing series of profiles of people who write for CollegeRecruiter.com through our blogs , articles, or our Ask the Experts questions and answers.

As an Economics major in college, I had great aspirations of conquering Wall Street. The problem was that I was choosing a career path based on what I thought was the “right thing to do,” not on what I enjoyed. It took two years in the banking industry to convince me that I needed to look within myself to make a career decision that would be satisfying for me. It was this realization that led me to pursue a career in education, and ultimately, as a career counselor. It is very gratifying for me to provide the kind of support that I wish had been available to me years ago.

I have been privileged to work with individuals during all stages of the career development process. This work has included assisting high school students in evaluating potential college majors, guiding current college students of all majors and class years, working with mid-career changers, providing support for dislocated and laid off workers, and counseling women returning to the workforce after voluntarily stopping out to raise children. These groups all have special needs and I have adapted my techniques accordingly. Being able to work with such a variety of people keeps me fresh and constantly interested in improving my skills.

In addition to my counseling background, I am also an accomplished public speaker. I have presented at many professional conferences on topics related to career and academic advising. I have also authored a number of articles on topics related to career development. My writing has also extended to humor pieces on the quandaries of being a working mother. I often infuse humor in my career counseling work; it helps make the process fun.

Since people change careers an average of five times in their lifetime, it is important that they learn the tools and techniques early on so they can become their own best guide. My goal is to teach and support but the doing is up to each individual.

Read more about Rachel on her CollegeRecruiter.com Biography

One of my favorite people is Paul DeBettignies of MNHeadhunter.com, and now he's sure to become even more popular with lots of people. Why? Because he's one of the few people outside of Canada who not only remember the World Hockey Association, but also went to a game. Amazing. I'll have to ask him sometime if he remembers the coach of the Saint Paul Fighting Saints, Glen Somnor, pulling out his dentures so that he could jump the boards into the Winnipeg Jets bench during a scrum. Quite the character, and so was Glen. :)

Seriously though, Paul just re-launched his web site with the help of Franki Durban at Durbin Media Group. For those who have not had the pleasure of meeting Franki, she's the (much) better half of Jim.

Congrats!!!

Some 3,055 undergrads and MBA's at top-tier schools were recently surveyed to learn which companies actively recruited them, how they view prospective employers, how they determine which to include on their short list, and which recruiting tactics were most effective. In the survey by Wetfeet, the students identiifed more than 1,100 employers and, of those, rated the following 10 as being the most effective recruiters:

1. McKinsey & Co.
2. The Boston Consulting Group
3. Bain & Co.
4. Deloitte & Touche
5. Lehman Brothers
6. Goldman Sachs
7. Target
8. Microsoft
9. JP Morgan Chase
10. Booz Allen Hamilton

Target, Microsoft and Deloitte & Touche joined the list. The dropping out were Citigroup, Johnson & Johnson and Kraft.

What was the difference between the best recruiters and the worst? According to the students, the best had great campus information sessions, sent a large number of impressive representatives to campus, treated candidates with respect, and had a strong word-of-mouth reputation. Note that job offers, salaries and employer prestige did not make that list. While important, even more important were the personal interactions the candidates had during the recruiting experience.

Other interesting tidbits were:


  • The average number of job offers received by undergraduates and MBAs increased for the fourth straight year, while the number of companies to which students applied has decreased.
  • Compensation expectations and offers received continue to increase. Some 71 percent of students said that they have increased their expectations from a year ago.
  • Students are more confident. About 86 percent said that they were confident they would find a job they wanted.

What plans do you have for September 12th and 13th? Chicago is lovely at that time of the year and if you're free, then make plans to attend the OnRec Expo 2006 Global Summit for Online Recruitment. I'll be one of the speakers and look forward to seeing some of the movers and shakers in the industry, including Joel Cheesman, Shally Steckerl, Peter Weddle, and John Sumser.

StevenRothberg_01.jpg
StevenRothberg_02.jpg
StevenRothberg_04.jpg

We recently joined Peter Weddle's International Association of Employment Web Sites. Member benefits include increased visibility and credibility through a media campaign, access to private reports on recruiter and job seeker behavior and views of on-line employment services, networking opportunities with other job board owners, a better ability to participate in the development of industry standards and best practices that will be promulgated to the public and media by the Association, and the right to display this really snazzy logo on our web site:

IAEWS.gif

In all seriousness, the IAEWS is a great idea and I'm honored to be a member. The first congress is Mon 9/11/06 in Chicago, which is the day before the first North American OnRec conference in the same location. I'll be at both and I know many others in this industry will be as well.

Today our guest blogger is David Kippen, PhD and Vice President Global Brand Strategy for TMP Worldwide.

david-kippen.jpgLet's face it: established brands have a huge advantage in competing for talent. Names like Google, Apple, Coca-Cola, Nike and others--brand names that each generation grows up with have an allure and appeal that's hard to beat when it comes to finding that first job. Though brands like these are developed and cultivated to cut through the clutter on the consumer side, that very drive to relevance makes them ever so attractive as places to work. And yet….

And yet, if you've been in the talent space for any length of time, you know well that big name brands aren't necessarily the best places to work--or to learn how to work. Wherever your organization finds itself, it's an interesting problem to have.

If you have no brand--or not much of a brand--you actually have a great opportunity to define yourself starting with a blank sheet of paper. And, while you might assume this would cost a fortune, it doesn't have to: after all, there's a far greater difference between saying nothing and saying something than there is between saying something and saying it more loudly.

What should you say? Beyond the cardinal rule of recruitment that you absolutely must tell the truth, what you should say will obviously depend on your particular business situation, but as a rule of thumb you'll want to message to the higher, or more aspirational ways in which the work experience you can provide intersects with the kind of people your prospects want to become. In other words, no matter how good the pay and benefits are, don't let them be the message, and as appealing as "fun work environment" sounds, many of the best and brightest actually want to, ahem, work for you. So go easy on the pizza Fridays and focus on the real-world development opportunities your company offers.

And if you have a big brand? Well, the bad news is that your prospects already have some very strong ideas about who you are and how it "must" be to work there, and many of these are at least a little off. The bad news is that you'll probably never be as fun, as exciting, as wonderful a place to work as your prospects imagine. The bad news is that you've got some really, really stiff competition and your prospects are looking at them, too.

But there's lots of good news, too. If your prospects are a bit off on what you offer, they're clear on one thing: they know they want to work for you (or someone just like you). If you're not as wonderful as they think you might be, you're still pretty darn cool--and, by association, your brand's pedigree has put your talent in a very special league--kinda like Harvard, but with pay.

And the competition? Well, the good news and the bad news are the same: you all keep raising the bar on each other. And that's good news no matter where you sit.

-- David Kippen, Ph.D. serves TMP Worldwide’s Vice President, Global Brand Strategy. Dr. Kippen leads branding and communications initiatives for TMP Worldwide’s largest accounts, including Burger King, Catholic Healthcare West, Chevron, Coca-Cola, Dell, Intel, Kaiser Permanente, Microsoft and T-Mobile, with emphasis on integrating internal and consumer brand positioning, national and global employment brand portfolio management, intra-corporate communications and internal/external communications organizational structure and alignment.

I'm pretty passionate about Facebook and other social networking sites. I love them -- and hate them. I love them because they make college campuses and other environments smaller by helping people find other people who share common interests. I hate them because they're so easy to misuse.

One of the dangers of Facebook for employees and job seekers is that employers are starting to use Facebook as part of their background checking process. Many students mistakenly believe that the only people who can or will access their Facebook profiles are other students. Those naive students will post naked photos of themselves, stories of sexual exploits, and write about getting drunk, stoned, or otherwise trashed. Sometimes those stories are true and sometimes they're not. If they're true, employers are less likely to want to hire those students because of concerns that their lifestyle and lack of judgment will spill over into the workplace. It has happened before with people named Bill. If the stories are not true, then employers are still not going to want to hire the student because posting that type of information in a public place is proof of your lack of judgment, even if the story isn't true.

One of the missing links in all of this has been finding students who have not been hired as a result of their Facebook postings or fired as a result of their Facebook postings. Well, there's now a poster child. C.M. Russell just wrote in his blog that the founder of social networking site Ziggs fired his intern after reading on the intern's Facebook page that the intern gets paid for "screwing around on IM" and "talking to [his] friends and getting paid for it." The irony is delicious.

aim.gifDo you instant message at work? Are you like Paul DeBettignies of MN Headhunter who uses instant messaging to communicate with college students? Are you only using IM'ing to communicate with your friends? Or are you one of the those who don't instant message at all? I use instant messaging frequently for key partners and employees, but rarely with clients because few of them want to communicate that way.

The most common reason I hear from business partners, clients, and vendors as to why they don't instant message is that they are afraid of the interruptions. That's a valid fear, but my experience has shown that it is unfounded. The people with whom I instant message are very respectful of my time and only instant message when the matter is truly urgent and can easily be taken care of through writing a short message or two. Everything else is by phone or email. Another reason I hear for not instant messaging is that they don't feel that it is a legitimate business tool. Even Robert Stephens of Twin Cities-based Geek Squad tech-help service thought that way until a month ago. He converted when he realized that instant messaging provided him with a powerful way of staying in touch with his far-flung workers.

I find that instant messaging saves me time and makes me more responsive to the needs of my clients, vendors, partners, and employees. Isn't that what is all about?

Every generation has different wants and needs. Older generations tend to look at younger generations and wonder how the world will survive. Somehow, we always muddle through it. While some might argue that life is worse now than it used to be, it is also true that far more people today than ever before need not worry about finding enough to eat, having adequate shelter, receiving medical care, being educated, living in a democratic society, etc.

So what does the new generation, Gen Y, want and need?

  • They live at home. American Sociological Association researchers found that by age 30, a much smaller percentage today (46 percent of women and 31 percent of men) have finished school, left home, gotten married, had a child or reached financial independence than did their counterparts in 1960.
  • They've gots gooder edumacation. The National Center for Education Statistics report that the number of undergraduates in 2004 (17.3 million) was almost double that in 1970 (8.6 million). Education Trust reports that only 37 percent of first-time freshmen at four-year schools earned their bachelor's degrees in four years.
  • They work, but on their terms. This free agent generation doesn't expect to stay with one employer for their lifetime or even in one job for years, so many travel and take jobs which are unrelated to their majors. Their first preference when looking to advance their careers is to move to a new position within their department as soon as they feel that they've learned everything they can. Failing that, they'll prefer to make an intracompany transfer by moving to another department. Despite their preferences to stay with the same employer, they also won't hesitate to jump to another employer if they are unable to make a move within their current organization. Opportunities for advancement are very important, so employers either need to provide them internally or watch the best of their upcoming talent walk out the door.
  • They value their leisure time and it overlaps with their work time. Gen Y constantly uses what older generations consider to be technology. This includes text messaging, portable music players like iPods, and even email. Unlike Gen Xers and Boomers, Millennials (Gen Yers) use technology constantly for work and to maintain relationships. They see nothing odd about carrying on a dozen instant messaging sessions simultaneously and wonder why older generations feel that talking by phone to only one person at a time could be thought of as being more connected with others.
  • They value helping others. Gen Y volunteers. A lot. UCLA's Higher Education Research Institute studied 260,000 college freshmen and found that 66.3 percent of freshmen believe that it is essential or very important to help others. That's the highest percentage to say so in 25 years.
Is your company adapting its workplace to allow these employees to fulfill their needs and wants? If not, you're either already losing in the race for talent or are about to start losing that most critical of races. Whether your Gen X or Boomer managers agree with the lifestyle preferences of Gen Y or not, those managers are not going to change those preferences. And if those managers try to impose their value systems upon their Gen Y employees or candidates, the best of those Gen Yers will end up working for your competition.

I am fortunate enough to be the moderator of the College Recruiter discussion list at the Electronic Recruiting Exchange, a group which has 861 members as of 7/21/06. A question that was recently posted to the group asked how to make college career service offices more relevant to students as very few students use the services of their college career service offices and the writer wanted to increase that number. I agree that career service offices are grossly under utilized by students, but as I mulled over the issue for a few days I came to the realization that the problem has at least two sides to it. In addition to the offices being under utilized, many of them also measure their effectiveness incorrectly.

I spoke at a college recruiting several years ago when this topic came up. An attendee from MonsterTRAK said that he had seen a study that indicated that only 14 percent of college seniors have ever physically visited their career service office and that it was quite challenging for their business to get students to use their site when they aren't using the services of their career service offices because their site depends so heavily upon the effectiveness of the career service offices. He felt that career service offices should not measure their effectiveness by the number of students who participate in on-campus interview, career counseling, career fairs, etc. but instead on the outcomes: how many students find a job in their desired career field with six months of graduation.

I believe that his belief was correct. Focusing on how many students walk through your door or how many resumes you help write or any of the other tactical issues causes you to lose sight of the strategic issues which are the most important: are your students finding the right jobs in the right timeframe? Stop defining success by the successful completion of tasks and instead define success by the outcomes that really matter.

Successful organizations do not measure the success of their sales people by how many sales calls those sales people make. They measure their success by their sales. Similarly, successful career service offices should want to measure their success by their outcomes rather than by their daily tasks.

This post to Introduce Terese Corey Blanck is part of an ongoing series of profiles of people who write for CollegeRecruiter.com through our blogs , articles, or our Ask the Experts questions and answers.

In addition to what CollegeRecruiter.com already discloses about me, I am anxiously awaiting the release of two new books my business partners and I authored over the past two years. The books, The College to Career Road Map: A Four-Year Guide to Finding Your Path and The College to Career Road Map: A Four Year Guide to Coaching Your Student, are being published by Atwood Publishing and are due out in the middle of August.

While being published is personally satisfying, I am prouder of the significant improvement I know the books will make in the lives of college students and their parents as they “team navigate” the four year college experience together.

My inspiration for the books was the variety of experiences I obtained as a college administrator in New York, Colorado and Minnesota at both public and private universities together with my experience as a corporate recruiter, account manager for a Fortune 100 company, a manager of a start-up staffing firm for recent college graduates and, most recently as a director of a small business and founding partner of my own company. I had the unique opportunity to view both sides of the equation – that of the recent college graduate and that of the prospective employer. It became readily apparent to me that there was a disconnect between not only the experience the graduate had and the need of the employer but also in the degree of self-introspection the graduate had engaged in when choosing a career path. In other words, I came to find that many grads had spent insufficient time considering what would “trip their career trigger.”

As a Director of Career Initiatives for a private company helping college students working towards careers in the “helping professions” obtain hands-on paid work experience, I have an intimate knowledge of the issues college students face preparing for and landing satisfying and engaging jobs. In other words, I help college students make “decisions with direction” – those decisions they need to make now that are designed to enable them to leave their college experience knowing what they are passionate about and having the requisite skills and experience to obtain a meaningful position upon graduation.

I am equally passionate about helping parents become great “coaches. The “parent coach” supports the college student in a healthy non-intrusive manner designed to promote self-sufficiency and independence. Simply put, while well intending, many parents are simply not “wired” to coach and support rather than direct and “hover.” As a “career coach” I worked with students and their parents to create a proper and mutually beneficial relationship.

College to Career, Inc. has permitted me to satisfy not only my love of writing but public speaking as well. Together with my co-authors and business partners Judith Anderson and Peter Vogt, College to Career has been a featured speaker at national seminars as well as at colleges and universities in the state of Minnesota. Peter, Judy and I have over 40 years of combined experience working with college students in a variety of settings. We each bring strengths to the company that I firmly believe will enable it to be vibrant and beneficial for years to come.

I strongly believe in balancing my business and home lives. Accordingly, my first order of priority has and always will be my daughter who is nine and a half and my husband of nearly 20 years. I most often do NOT work more than 40 hours per week (even with what has turned out to be two full-time jobs!), which permits me to keep a fresh perspective and positive outlook on life.

Read more about Terese in her Biography on CollegeRecruiter.com

Since we started building an opt-in database of cell phone addresses a year ago, we've seen a steady increase in the number of employers who are interested in targeting college students and recent graduates by sending to their cell phones a text message (SMS). The message can direct the candidates to the employer's web site or allow the candidate to reply back with questions. Today a client requested some counts and I was pretty blown away by how far we've come in the last year and just how high a percentage of students have opted to receive messages to their cell phones. Unlike Gen X or Boomers, Gen Y is comfortable communicating via text messaging and many prefer it.

cell-phone.jpg At four-year colleges, we have 3,667,159 emails, 1,893,655 SMS, and 1,088,443 matching. A match allows us, for example, to first deliver a targeted email and then follow-up with the same people at some point in the future by SMS. Some clients use that to SMS just those candidates who click through from the email.

For the two-year schools, we have 1,450,618 emails, 812,203 SMS, and 427,734 matching. That means that at all four- and two-year colleges, we have 5,117,777 emails, 2,705,858 SMS, and 1,436,177 matching. All are opt-in. Wow.

There's no question that the demand for college students and recent graduates is hotter now than it has been since 2000, but most of the attention has been focused on the private sector. What we all need to remember is that much of the demand is coming from the public sector, particularly areas related to homeland security. These areas include federal and state jobs with the military, customs enforcement, disaster preparation and disease prevention, as well as employment to support federal, state and local security efforts. The demand for employees with security clearances -- both in the government and the private sector -- may be at an all time high. College graduates with specialties in computer science, foreign language and math are particularly desirable in high-tech homeland security fields.

Because of the wars that we're fighting, the government right now has an astronomical need for college grads who have muscle in their arms and legs to go overseas and muscles between their ears to do intelligence work domestically. The federal government expects to hire 37,215 workers in coming years in the job category "security, enforcement and compliance assistance," according to a February 2005 federal report. That includes criminal investigators, airport screeners, border patrol agents and intelligence officers. The report didn't include data from the National Security Agency or the Central Intelligence Agency, which is confidential. But it noted that President Bush has called for an increase of 50 percent in some CIA jobs, a possible increase of 2,200 new clandestine officers.

Source: Courier Journal

This post to Introduce Janine A. Schindler is part of an ongoing series of profiles of people who write for CollegeRecruiter.com through our blogs , articles, or our Ask the Experts questions and answers.


Janine Schindler is a certified executive coach with twenty-three years of experience spanning the corporate ranks in Fortune 1000 and 100 firms. As the owner of JAS Coaching & Training (JASCAT), she works with an established worldwide client base and provides an ongoing partnership designed to help clients produce fulfilling results.

Clients receive expertise accompanied with a sense of humor and creative listening. Past and current clients say she is a great catalyst for professional and personal growth. Working with leaders and teams at all levels, JASCAT develops leaders who have the competency required to ensure the organization's plans become a reality.

Janine is certified and licensed to deliver many coaching programs including Genos Emotional Intelligence Assessment, DiSC Behavioral Assessment, and Whole Brain Thinking Assessments.

Janine has contributed to books and articles related to career issues, is an expert panelist with CollegeRecruiter.com has been a two-term President of the International Coach Federation—NYC Chapter and founding member of the organization’s Speakers Bureau. She is a regular guest expert on ABC World News This Morning and has appeared on Discovery Channel’s Health Cops. Janine is a sought after speaker, trainer, media guest, expert and instructor with coaching schools and NYU.

She provides career coaching and leads seminars for Workstream, Inc., the first human capital management (HCM) solutions provider. Current and past clients include executives, professionals, and individuals who seek to move their business, personal lives, or both to higher levels. Janine's belief is that everyone should have fun every day.

Learn more about Janine on her CollegeRecruiter.com Biography or Watch Video Clips of Janine from ABC World News This Morning - Moneyscope

I know this article is going to be controversial because businesses that rely on employer and recruiters are very reluctant to admit, that the customer isn’t always right.

If employers do not put what they are looking for accurately in the job description they can’t expect to find it. It is like going on a road trip through New York State with a map of Arizona. Good luck.

In my experience as the President and Founder of several online career centers and an HR Consulting company, the vast majority of disappointed employers tend to complain about the unqualified applicants who apply to their jobs. However, the root of the problem is really the unclear job posting. The employers complain that the unqualified candidates who apply to their jobs are wasting their time but in fact it is them who are wasting the candidate’s time.

All of the articles I read in the marketplace are for candidates helping them write cover letters, format their resumes and conduct a job search. Nobody does anything to help the employer with writing a clear job description.

The job description should include the following:

1) Brief Description Of The Company
2) Accurate Job Role and Task Description
3) Clear Directives Of Mandatory Requirements, Licenses, Skills or Years Of Experience
4) How, When And On What Criteria The Employer Will Follow Up With The Candidate.

Title is important as well, it should include the following:

1) Job Title
2) Level Of Job (Senior, Junior, CEO Etc)
3) Geography City & State/Province

If you have any questions on how to write clear and accurate job descriptions or have any comments on this article please do not hesitate to contact me.

Jason Stevens
President & Founder
HRHQ
jason@hrhq.com
315.262.0801

As thousands of students begin their summer migration to corporate campuses to serve as interns, two possible fates await them:

The interns may find they are driven hard to learn the business and to accomplish real results, while earning the respect of their managers and accumulating valuable impressions of the firm’s executive team. Conversely, interns may end up making the coffee, fiddling with back-burner projects, fending for themselves in an unfamiliar city and otherwise learning how dispensable they are to the organization.

In reality, the latter fate is all too common. Even among major corporations, “internship programs are incredibly inconsistent in terms of quality,” says Steven Rothberg, president of CollegeRecruiter.com in Minneapolis. “You hear all the time about investment banking houses sending their interns to the mailroom for three months.”

That doesn’t bode well for human resources departments, which have a keen interest in internship programs: recruitment. “Bringing in students directly from college is key to having a good, sustainable pipeline of employment,” says Lonnie Pacelli, a human resources consultant in Sammamish, Wash., who oversaw internship programs while he was a manager at Microsoft and Accenture.

But some companies shy away from making the investments that a robust internship program requires, including the interns’ pay and perks, their supervisors’ time, and facilities costs and other overhead. Advocates of internships counter that these expenses shouldn’t be considered in a vacuum, but rather relative to the costs of other modes of recruitment, which can run to tens of thousands of dollars for candidates with senior management potential.

Without Internships, Employers Miss the Cream of the College Crop.

Internships are a powerful recruitment engine indeed. Employers make offers of full-time employment to 58 percent of students who serve as interns within their organizations, according to the 2004 Experiential Education Survey by the National Association of Colleges and Employers. And these offers that follow internships boast an impressive conversion rate; nearly 78 percent of them are accepted.

With internships so common these days, HR executives need to show hiring managers that if they don’t connect with college students before they’re seniors, the entry-level recruitment pool is already picked over. “Most of AOL’s entry-level hiring is done through our internship programs,” according to an explanation on the company’s Web site.

The recruitment potential of internships isn’t just about the numbers. Student internships are also a means of reaching out to sought-after diverse students who show much promise. Time Warner Cable’s STARS internship program, for example, specifically targets these potential recruits, tempting college and even high-school students with mentoring in the entertainment, media and telecom industries.

Human Resources Should Orient Interns and Oversee Firm-Wide Training.

When student interns head for their temporary cubicles, HR’s first job is to provide support for this next generation of potential recruits.

“Our job is getting the interns to that first day, and through the first week of training,” says Blane Ruschak, national director of university relations for KPMG in New York City. Internships are a major recruitment program at KPMG, where about 1,000 students converge for national training on one day in June.

As a public accounting firm, KPMG’s operations are heavily regulated. So, training is critical, whether the trainees are interns or new hires. “Interns go through firm-wide training and risk-management training, so they understand what rules they’re bound by,” says Ruschak, whose group reports to human resources.

Interns Can’t Thrive Without Demanding and Meaningful Work.

Beyond those first days, HR plays a critical part in ensuring that interns are given important work and have someone to turn to if issues arise. “HR’s role should be – and often isn’t – to educate hiring managers” about how important it is for the company to make a positive and powerful impression on interns, says Rothberg.

“HR needs to put guidelines in place,” says Pacelli. “Interns aren’t there at managers’ disposal; they’re there to make an assessment of whether to spend a career at the company.” To maximize the benefits of the internship for all parties, students should work side-by-side with full-timers doing the same job, he adds. Internships organized around “special projects” often look like make-work, and sometimes are.

“We make sure our interns serve on client engagements,” says Ruschak of KPMG. Students in the firm’s internship program typically are assigned to two or three audit, tax or advisory clients.

Hiring managers who want to foster ongoing relationships with best-and-brightest interns need to consider the value of the summer experience from the student’s point of view.

“Student interns tend to make more of an impact more quickly than employers expect,” says Philip Meade, internship coordinator for Adelphi University in Garden City, N.Y. “An intern who ends up sitting around a lot will be concerned about having a hole in his resume because he didn’t accomplish much.”

What Students Should Take Away from Their Internships.

At summer’s end, the best potential recruits will remember more about the substance of the internship than its style, observers say. “It’s not about impressing students by taking them to a luxury box at the ball game,” says Rothberg. “It’s about turning them on to the work.”

Still, savvy firms, even industry leaders, find ways to endear themselves to the top student performers. Microsoft gives its summer interns a round-trip plane ticket, provides a health club membership and pays for outside training seminars. Nearly 58 percent of employers responding to the NACE survey provide housing assistance to their interns.

-- Courtesy of Workforce Insights. Copyright 2006. All rights reserved. Written by John Rossheim, a journalist in Providence, RI. He writes about workplace issues, employment trends and changing relationships between employers and workers.

This post is part of the Recruiting.com Blogswap. Your HR Guy writes today about interviewing effectively with bad hiring managers.

Part one of my post runs with the assumption that most in-person interviews aren't going to be ideal for determining what your skills are and whether or not you are the best fit for a company and/or position. So while you are preparing to do a job search, here are some helpful steps to get past even the worst of interviewers (the type that thinks he is the greatest interviewer in the world):

1.) Be a great interviewee. Take that part out of the question. Some hiring managers will hire based on interview alone so practice, practice practice. College career centers do a good job of setting up mock interviews and at the least, they can get you comfortable talking about yourself.

2.) Be prepared for any interview style. Some might give you a behavioral interview. Some might give you a conversational interview. Some may be reading off of notes in a cramped office and some may be walking you through the warehouse floor. Be prepared for anything to happen and know how to best react.

3.) Showcase your knowledge. Both your own knowledge and your knowledge about the company and the position. If your interviewer doesn't ask you a question that you feel helps establish a job fit, ask a leading question during the appropriate time such as: "Would it be useful in this position to have general accounting knowledge with specific A/P expertise?" If you've done your research, this question will rarely backfire.

Those three things will help you overcome a bad interviewer or a good interviewer on a bad day. And even if it doesn't ultimately win you the job in the end, it will help you become a better interviewee.

Etiquette. The word may bring to mind images of the Victorian Era and unnatural rules of behavior. But today basic etiquette is an important part of presenting a positive image to your boss or to your clients or customers. The skills required to project a relaxed and competent image are now receiving attention from all types of organizations, which expect employees at a variety of levels to be able to successfully present themselves and the company’s interests.

“Many people that make it to the top understand these rules, and they expect others to know them too. Most of the people I work with are upwardly mobile and good at their jobs but might lack the social skills to take that next step,” explains Jane Wilger, president of Minneapolis-based Wilger Image Development.

Wilger provides common sense guidelines for situations business people frequently experience, whether they are engineers, salespeople, administrators or executives. In her seminars, Wilger discusses all aspects of business meals, how to dress for success, body language, introductions, and even cellular phone manners. A few of her favorite tips follow below:

Introductions

While introductions may appear simple, these are the few moments in which critical first impressions are made on all sides.

“Always stand up when being introduced to someone,” says Wilger. “If you’re sitting across a large table it may not be possible to reach across and shake hands, but you can at least stand.”

The name of the person of highest rank, or the person of honor, should be spoken first; all others are being presented to that person. For example, “President Clinton, I’d like you to meet Jane Smith.”

“The person of highest rank,” says Wilger, “is first the client, or any person who is outside of your organization, unless they are a member of your family. Second, it is the person with a higher position, so that a manager would be introduced to a vice president.”

Handshakes

“Whether you’re a man or a woman, jobs can still be won or lost on the basis of a firm handshake,” says Wilger. Men and women should shake hands with each other the same way as woman to woman or man to man. Offer your hand turned at a 90 degree angle to the floor and don’t hold just the fingers or try to crush the other person’s hand with an iron grip.

During a cocktail hour, hold your drink in the left hand. Do this both to keep your right hand free, and so it is not cold and wet from holding a glass.

Some men may wait for a woman to offer her hand to be shaken, rather than automatically extending their hand to her. Wilger advises women to “get your hand out there right away so there is no confusion.” She offers the same advice to anyone who might have a disability in their right hand or arm. “Bob Dole puts his left hand out there to shake right away, and people just learn to shake left hands with him.”

Dining

“Your napkin should go into your lap within the first ten seconds of sitting down,” says Wilger. And once in your lap, the napkin should never again be placed on the table until everyone leaves at the end of the meal. If you need to stand or leave the table during the meal, the napkin should be left on your chair.

Wilger says she is often asked what to do if something is stuck in your teeth. “The rule is that it should come out the same way it went in.” If it went in by hand, such as grape stones, olive pits or bits of nut shell, it goes out by hand. If it went on a spoon, such as something in a soup, it should come out by spoon. An exception to this rule are small clean things such as fish bones, which likely went in on a fork, but can be removed by hand.

Wilger also notes it is best to be as discreet as possible. Trying too hard to cover up what you’re doing by hiding behind your napkin actually draws more attention to the process than if you try to quietly remove the problem food.

Paying the Bill

If you think there might be a scuffle about who will pay the bill, or if you simply want it handled in a swift and subtle way, Wilger suggests the following. “Arrive at the restaurant a few minutes early, tell them you are entertaining a client and ask them to run your credit card through. Then the bill will come straight to you and all you have to do at the end of the meal is figure the tip and sign your name.”

Small Talk

“The purpose of small talk is to find something in common and create a bond,” says Wilger. “The best way to do this is to ask people questions. Trying to be witty is less important than being observant and asking good questions.”

Wilger does not feel politics and religion need to be avoided as topics, as long as no blanket attacks are made, and especially if you know the person you’re talking with has similar interests. However, “never, ever bring up sex in any context,” said Wilger. “And never swear. People get into a social situation and they let their guard down. People are still often perceived as less intelligent if you have to swear to make your point.”

Telephone Manners

A recent addition to Wilger’s bag of tips is cellular phone etiquette. “Technology poses some etiquette questions that are entirely new to us. For example, cell phone time is often expensive. Don’t ask to use someone’s cell phone unless it is an emergency, especially if that person is a client. But regardless of whose phone it is, always offer to pay for the call.”

-- Courtesy of Wilger Image Development. In addition to seminars and individual coaching, Wilger offers a four-part video series titled “Beyond First Impressions: Your Professional Image.” Topics in the series include: Social Functions, Introductions, First Impressions, and Dining Etiquette. For more information or to order, write Wilger Image Development, 618 Washington Avenue North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 or call 612-341-9377. Courtesy of Article Resource Association; www.aracopy.com; e-mail: info@aracopy.com

I have lived in Charlotte, North Carolina, all my life, except for the years I went to Wake Forest University. I have two daughters who just graduated from college and have gotten their first jobs. My oldest daughter is an Event Planner for Coca Cola, here in Charlotte, and my youngest daughter, is a research assistant for a retained search firm, following in Dad's footsteps.

Outside of work, I enjoy a variety of activities including golf, biking, running, basketball and traveling to the ocean and the mountains on a regular basis. I am also active in volunteer activities, mainly working with at risk youth who are in high school.

It is my goal to see that they get an opportunity to go on to a college, if that is what they want to do. I have had two of the youth I work with go on to college; one has graduated and the other is just starting.

Happily married, my wife has a business taking people to Europe to buy antiques, www.antiqueslimited.com and I travel with her from time to time. We are most fortunate to have lots of family and friends here in Charlotte. My only sister, is in the military, via her husband, who is a lifetime Navy man. They are currently stationed in Japan.

I do really enjoy helping people with their career moves, whether it is on a professional or a personal basis.

To learn more about Robert Jones professional biography, continue reading here.

The Kansas City Star recently ran an article listing the best sites for college students who want to blog. CollegeRecruiter.com was included in the list along with more the established Facebook, MySpace, LiveJournal, and Blogger. Kudos to our Content Manager Shawn Augustson and the well over 100 candidates, employers, internship experts, financial aid experts, resume writing experts, career counselors, and admissions counselors who are blogging on CollegeRecruiter.com.

The dynamics of an interview ebb and flow in interesting ways. As things progress, it seems that the outcome is easy to predict. However, there can be one small thing that triggers a change of course and a very different outcome. It just happened that I parked myself at a fast food establishment a few days ago that was in the process of conducting several interviews. As fate would have it, I sat at the table next to where all the interviews occurred.

I would venture to guess that the company was in hiring mode and needed to fill several positions. (In fact, I overheard how many different locations needed staff.) The applicants were diverse, in some instances, polar opposites. But each has the qualities to some degree that the company seeks.

As the candidates entered the establishment, I formed my opinion of whether they were winners or not. My first two criteria were appearance and race. One candidate was white and wore business casual clothing. The other was black. The clothing was pulled here and there and exposed skin. She was a little rattled from the journey. Hair was unkempt.

What was impressive was not just that each candidate was given an application and asked to complete it, irrespective of first impressions. There was more, even in addition to the fact that each candidate was given equal respect and regard. The tone, the language was comparable.

In addition to those first stages, it was interesting to see that the interview was based on pre-scripted interview questions. "Oh, this is never going to work," I thought. "How can you conduct a good interview based on scripted questions that don't allow leeway for unusual responses or circumstances?" On the other hand, I was impressed with the pre-scripted questions. That meant no matter what the gender, race, age, or functional ability, the interview questions were exactly the same. There was equal opportunity.

It is important to express that I very definitely have old-school, conservative biases that are influenced by the times through which I've lived, the industries in which I've worked, and various other factors. That being said, my first impression as I listened to the opening of each interview was that the white candidate would be made an offer and the black would not. But as I worked and overheard, my judgment of the situations changed.

The white candidate was looking for something to fill in as she pursued her ultimate goal. She was forthright in making that known right away. The interviewer understood; it can be allowed due to the nature of the fast food business. She immediately asked about hours and shifts so that detail was also dispensed with early on. Then it got down to the details. The scripted questions were asked; good responses were made. Well modulated, courteous tones flowed from each. They matched the other's style. The question of which location came up at the end and was resolved. The company will get in touch within so much time was the response to a question about what the next steps will be and in what time. A polite parting after about 20 to 30 minutes of conversation.

The next interview started. The candidate had taken the time to pull clothing into proper places and cover exposed skin. However, she was still wired and it showed with various movements, speech, and other indicia. This time, there were two interviewers. Both were just as courteous with this candidate as the one had been with the first. The one who did the most talking was expert in helping the candidate calm down without calling attention to her obvious nervousness. Calm, soothing voice, focused on those pre-scripted questions, while offering the type of courtesy and regard that he would expect from another.

Something happened during that interview, something very interesting. During the course of it, the candidate became aware that she was not being interviewed for just another staff opportunity. She had passed the initial interview questions with a great deal of success. Her tone changed to more reserved and contemplative. She was extremely calm. It was the interviewer who began talking to her about the management opportunity that lay ahead while she spoke of why she saw this as a career opportunity. She spoke of how she held a long-term desire to work for this company and why, how it differed from past employers and competitors. The interview continued. It must have been a hour later and it still was not complete. They'd only gotten to talking about strengths and weaknesses.

It was perhaps another 20 minutes later that the interview was completed, details of the management training class she would attend were discussed, and when she would start. And still, the pre-scripted questions were followed so that no details about "closing" were overlooked. Yes, the second interviewer participated but only in a marginal way.

What was reaffirmed was it isn't a good idea to judge a book by its cover. Scripts definitely do work for providing a good interview environment that discloses the best candidate. Finally, I learned that in this competitive, find fault environment, it is possible to have fair and equal based on qualities and talent brought to the table.

But this was the interviewing nexis. Yet another interview occurred. Initially, it sounded like a candidate for a tutoring position. As it ended, it sounded like the tables were reversed and it was actually a book or article being written by the one I thought was the candidate. There were good questions posed for edification and clarification. I was impressed with the performance of the one I thought was the candidate.

The take-away here was take your interviewing questions with you. Make certain they are focused and drive more comprehension of the job, its goals, the outcomes, the customer profile. Make clarifying statements; make declarative statements that attest to one's comprehension of what was said. Listen for how the company representative responds. Note whether they are tactful or whether they make any denegrating statements whatsoever. What the representative says is a reflection on not only them, but the company and the manner in which they deliver their services. It denotes what type of quality can be expected in the long run.

No matter which side of the desk you're on, the dynamics of the interview tell a very interesting story that may appear to be one way at the beginning but end on a very different note.

Communication in a business is part of one's brand. Novel idea. But it's true. The tone of the communication, its timing, the content, to whom it's directed all say a great deal about the inner workings of the organization. And the focus is not on the newsletter, the correspondence, the web page blurbs that talk about the mission and focus and purpose and driving force. Today's examination is the oral communication that exists in the business.

Not only do oral communications, speech, say a lot about the culture of the organization, they indicate what the customer as well as the future employee should expect of the product and the relations they will have with the company. They become part of the brand.

More Than Harmony
Good communication flows from good listening and comprehension. It creates harmony because everyone understands what is supposed to happen and why and they work together on the same initiative. But good communication is more than just harmony. Good communication is getting the message across effectively.

However, oral communication makes a stamp on the image being projected. More than harmony, the type of talk used within a company indicates the level of fractiousnes, emotional maturity, professionalism, quality of management, amount of direction and control, boundaries that are set and held, as well as the level of morale. Finally, the type of speech used is usually an indication of the amount of care and quality that goes into the product.

I'm in Winnipeg, Manitoba visiting family, friends, and seeing what has changed since I moved to Minneapolis in 1988. The recent growth is impressive, but pales in comparison to that in Calgary, Alberta. That city has seen explosive growth in the past few years due in large part to the huge growth in energy costs. Alberta has more oil than Saudi Arabia, although the oil in Saudi Arabia pretty much spurts out of the ground when you stick your finger into the sand. The oil in Alberta, unfortunately, needs to be extracted from the sand and that's a costly process.

So what does this all have to do with recruitment? Well, the explosive growth in Calgary's energy industry has led to a rapidly growing population and more and more difficulty for local organizations in their efforts to recruit qualified candidates let alone highly qualified candidates. The Calgary Police Departmet is no exception and is now paying its new hires $50,000 per year plus benefits. They're also running recruitment billboard and other ads across Canada, including in Winnipeg. While Winnipeg has seen some growth, the growth here is so much slower that the police department here is paying $32,000 per year. For those who struggled through math, that's almost half what Calgary is paying for the same people.

Now here's what drives me nuts. Rather than the Winnipeg Police Department focusing on the benefits to living in Winnipeg versus the hassles of living in Calgary, they instead are focusing on the compensation issue by proactively telling potential recruits that the cost of living in Calgary is much higher so the salary difference isn't as bad as it seems. That's true, but why would they want to draw attention to the issue that is probably their weakest? They should focus on quality of life issues, safety, culture, anything that they are better at than their Calgary counterparts.

Successful recruiters understand that they are more like sales people than human resource administrators. They need to sell their organization -- not lie -- but sell. Those that do thrive. Those that don't run a lot of ads that don't pull well and then point their fingers at external forces which are beyond their control. There are external forces beyond the control of all of us. But to shrug and fail to adapt is not acceptable. Adapt. Try new things. Don't be afraid to take risks in order to succeed.

Yvonne and CollegeRecruiter.com have been associated with one another since 2001. The relationship has grown over the years to include her collaborating in the book, The Last Job Search Guide You'll Ever Need, being one of the panelists on Ask the Experts, article and podcast contributor, and now as the Career Coach team member. Yvonne sees her role as being the one who provides a no-nonsense, non-pie in the sky, version of the work world and pursuing opportunities. She's there to cheer the interns for their victories, boost their spirits during the dips, and offer constructive insights and advice.

In addition to career coaching, Yvonne is an Organizational Development Consultant. She approaches things principally from a management perspective in order to find solutions to situations in business operations, systems management, employee attraction and retention, assistance with employee development initiatives, and succession planning.

I love talking to people. I love to read. I've been known to read labels on bottles and packages in grocery stores and strike up conversations with total strangers at the drop of a hat. It's not uncommon for me to be the pivotal piece in starting a commuter party on the Gold Line and then have fellow passengers wonder how that happened. Outgoing and convivial are two parts of my personality.

My first and enduring career passion is the law. At the ripe old age of 13, I determined that I wanted to be a lawyer. Without any type of outside counsel, I determined that one day I might miss a case deadline, lose the case, get sued by my client, get disbarred, and go bankrupt in total shame. So I opted for the next best career in law -- legal secretary. I went through all the tiers of the legal career except being a lawyer. But this was good because I had the opportunity to see what each tier was about and that it did not hold the amount of challenge and reward I need. I still want to return to law school and actually complete my law degree as well as earn my license to practice.

Another very long standing desire is to travel the world, several times over. It's because of this insatiable desire to know more about other places and actually see them, to know the people, politics, social and religious structures, and other dynamics that make the countries unique. Another dream job I have is being a global journalist who goes from one place to another reporting on events. Talking to the leaders, as well as the man on the street, about things that are happening in their country, getting their perspective on why, the solutions, how those things are affecting them. And then tie up all of that information into how it affects the U.S. and other countries.

I totally enjoyed my two-year radio broadcast. The reason was that it was the culmination of all of my past careers. It was a broadcast about the legal news for the week sent out on a private band to 13 Bay Area counties to 13,000 visually impaired listeners. I was the producer. That meant I developed a relationship with the sponsoring newspaper and went through a week's worth of news. I then selected news stories that would be of interest to my listeners. At times, I wrote my own reportage from a one-paragraph blurb (often called a nutgraph). It was delightful to get back from having done my story over my broadcast and find that The Chronicle had run a full story on the same subject that was nearly identical to mine! I had the opportunity to put together roundtable discussions of experts on topics of interest, ballot measure issues that needed closer examination and discussion, feature judicial profiles of those vying for election. I was writing, I was using the law, I was talking, I was interviewing, I was developing special content.

I love writing -- just about any type of writing.

More information about Yvonne can be read on her CollegeRecruiter.com Biography .

Shannon Seery Gude of EXCELER8ion dropped me an email to direct me to a great speech by Penn State President Graham Spanier. The remarks by Spanier started with the top four ways to know that you've been out of college for too many years:

4) A $4 bottle of wine is no longer "pretty good stuff."

3) You go from 130 days of vacation time to 14.

2) Over 90 percent of the time you spend in front of a computer is for real work.

And the No. 1 way you can tell you've been out of college too long ...

1) You hear your favorite song on the elevator at work.

Today's CollegeRecruiter.com Blog posting is courtesy of Toby Dayton of JobDig as part of the Recruiting.com Blog Swap.

The Minneapolis Star Tribune ran a great story yesterday on the deal that TCF Financial Corp. has struck with the University of Minnesota. As part of the company’s $35 million naming rights deal for football stadium, TCF also received a wide range of additional branding, marketing, and advertising perks including access to 236,300 alumni and season ticket holder names and addresses, the right to put the TCF logo everywhere you could imagine around the stadium, and the right to become the dominant bank on campus, pushing competitors off campus.

Leaving aside the ramifications surrounding the TCF/University of Minnesota stadium deal, and there are many, what if a similar type of arrangement was struck with employers who were trying to reach college students with employment opportunities? Or companies like Monster who wanted to establish themselves as the sole provider of recruitment advertising around the university? It is not inconceivable that some day 3M or General Mills might pay the university some amount of money to be the only company who could recruit on campus, or maybe paid a smaller fee to be the first company every year to host their own job fair, giving them first crack at the top students. How about Monster paying a fee to be the only company that was allowed to host a career fair on campus?

As baby-boomers retire and the resulting shortfall of 32 million workers becomes an increasingly acute problem for employers in the coming years, these types of arrangements will not only be considered and discussed, they will most likely become a reality in one form or another. They may not happen everywhere, and certain institutions will resist the temptation of easy money, but companies will undoubtedly become extremely aggressive in establishing exclusive access to pools of talent as a means to assure they find the employees they need to compete. The issues around privacy, competition, open access to employment opportunities, commercialism, and the role schools play in helping their students find employment are complex and multi-faceted. As the issues take shape in the years ahead, students must pay close attention to what their schools are doing in this area and become active and vocal to make sure their needs and interests are being attended to. And as is always the case, the more responsibility students assume for their own career development, the more immune they will be to what is happening in the world of recruitment advertising.

-- Toby Dayton is the Chief Operating Officer and President of Minneapolis-based JobDig, an employment-focused media company that helps business of all sizes within any industry lower the cost and improve the effectiveness of their hiring and recruitment advertising. JobDig does this through classified advertising and integrated multimedia solutions involving print, radio, television, and the web.

Jim Durbin was kind enough to post a welcome message at Recruiting.com for Shawn Augustson, our new Content Manager. Thanks, Jim!

Shawn and I have worked together for nine years. His responsibilities as the Content Manager will be to find new bloggers for our blogs (employers, internship experts, career counselors, admissions counselors, candidates, resume writers, and financial aid experts), get new bloggers signed up and activated, help existing bloggers, post articles to our site, and continue to be the awesome resource that he is in every other way.

Anyone who is interested in college recruiting and getting more exposure for themselves and/or their organization should blog at CollegeRecruiter.com, the leading site for entry level jobs and internships. We have well over 100 bloggers already and that number is rapidly increasing, thanks largely to the great work being done by Shawn and Jim (Durbin Media is also helping CollegeRecruiter.com recruit new bloggers). To learn more, feel free to contact Shawn at Shawn@CollegeRecruiter.com.

The average student loan debt for a U.S. college graduate is now $19,200, according to a study published by the State Public Interest Research Group, a Washington-based independent research organization. That's 58 percent higher than 10 years ago after adjustments for inflation. Other than energy and healthcare, I can't think of too many consumer products that have increased at nearly that rate. Remember, that's adjusted for inflation.

What does this mean to college graduates? A lot. It effects their choice of schools, majors, classes, and perhaps most significantly, career paths. Want to be a social worker? Sorry. They don't make enough money. Go into law. Want to be an entrepreneur and help create jobs? Sorry. Too risky because should you fail your student loans won't be discharged when you file for bankruptcy. Want to work for a non-profit? Sorry, unless you're considering enlisting in the military because they will help pay for your college education.

College education has never been cheap. But it has never been this expensive and it is getting more and more expensive every day. Some spend an enormous amount of energy criticizing our youth for mortgaging their futures by taking on too much debt. While I agree that too much debt is a bad thing for everyone, I hope that more people start to spend more energy on finding ways of bringing down the costs of a college education.

As the content manager for CollegeRecruiter.com, I would like to introduce you to Kevin Donlin who writes for our CollegeRecruiter.com Insights by Resume Writing Experts Blog.

Kevin is President of Guaranteed Resumes. Since 1996, he and his team have provided resumes, cover letters and job search help to clients in all 50 states. Author of "51 Ways to Find a Job Fast -- Guaranteed," Kevin has been interviewed by USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, CBS Radio and many others. You can read more about Kevin in his CollegeRecruiter.com biography.

In the coming days, I will profile more of our blog authors, including those who write for our Insights by Employers Blog, Insights by Internship Experts Blog, Insights by Admissions Counselors Blog, Insights by Candidates Blog, and Insights by Financial Aid Experts Blog.

I recently had the good fortune of speaking about podcasting and blogging at the National Association of Colleges and Employers annual conference and the Southwest Association of Colleges and Employers annual conference. In both presentations, I discussed how Duke University and Harvard Medical School were two of the first schools to use podcasting as part of their education delivery systems. Now the University of North Carolina (UNC) Charlotte has joined the fray. Trust me: many others will soon follow.

Professors can use podcasting to deliver lectures to students via their computers and the students can then download those podcasts to their iPods. While some may view this as making it easier for students to cut class, I view this as a way of relieving students from being primarily focused on copying down everything that a professor says during the lecture so that the student can instead focus on actually listening to what the professor says. Then, when it comes time to review your brief notes, you can do so while listening to the lecture again through your iPod and replay the lecture or parts of it as many times as you wish.

"The benefits of these podcasts are very practical to the users and to the university," said Mirsad Hadzikadic, dean of the College of Information Technology. "Users have a new source of easily accessible information from our staff and faculty and from visiting experts, and the college increases its profile among people who are interested in computing and informatics. And, hosting the podcasts is fun."

The only downside to trends such as this is that they are largely confined to Gen Y. Gen X'ers like me and older generations are able to use technology such as podcasts, but that technology is not integrated into our daily lives to the same extent. I've said it before and I'll say it again, I don't think that the generation in college should be called Gen Y. They should be called Gen W with the W standing for wired or, even more appropriately, wireless. This is the wireless generation folks, and they are going to do some remarkable things for all of us.

The vast majority of recruiters and hiring managers are members of Gen X and Boomers. Many of them have difficulty understanding the needs and wants of Gen Y. In an interesting compare-and-contrast article in today's ER Daily, Kevin Wheeler accurately summarizes the values of Gen Y:

This is a generation that values balance and moderation. They want time to be with friends. They are conformists and team players, more than any other generation, and they will be very loyal if the organization provides them with a few things: flexible schedules, the opportunity to take long periods of time (without pay) to travel or do community service, and project- or group-focused work that has measurable outcomes. They respect leaders and want someone to look up to.

Right on the button, Kevin. As a member of Gen X, I look at the values of Gen Y and am excited for our future. This upcoming generation understands what is important in life. They work to live, not live to work. They are loyal but not blindly loyal. They value their friends and community more than their paychecks. Our futures are in good hands.

I would like to start introducing our experts and counselors through a featured profile for all of our site viewers to be able to read and learn more about. I will start off with myself and provide you with some information about me.

I recently returned from Iraq after a year and half deployment. I have been hired as the Content Manger for CollegeRecruiter.com. I am responsible for recruiting and retaining bloggers and other writers, providing them with assistance such as generating new logins and topic suggestions, monitoring content to make sure it is G rated, and working to position CollegeRecruiter.com to become the focal point for information posted about issues related to college recruitment from schools, employers, students, graduates, and others.

I have known Steven Rothberg, the founder of CollegeRecruiter.com for over nine years. Together we have worked on many projects. In college I was an art major in the areas of graphic design, illustration and multimedia production. Steven and I started working together while I was doing freelance graphic design.

I have a blog which I just recently started called SoldierNow.com – http://www.SoldierNow.com which is basically a military blog to provide information to future soldiers who are thinking about joining the army. My goal is to help them find what interest them, provide any information about bonuses they can receive when enlisting and helpful resources to get them ready for talking with a recruiter. So if you know anyone interested in joining the army, send them my way. Have them mention CollegeRecruiter.com so I can not only provide them with information about the army, but other resources that are available through CollegeRecruiter.com that may be of interest to them.

Facts about me:
• I am married to my wife Melody. Both of us went to high school and college together. She is a CPA (or as I like to call her, a math geek) for Limited Brands corporate headquarters in the Bath & Body Works division. We have three children (2 boys, 1 girl ages 9, 5, and 2).
• In my spare time I enjoy playing ice hockey, day trading the stock market, painting with oils and acrylics, digital photography, & blogging.
• Member of Phi Kappa Tau Fraternity, Beta Phi Chapter

Shawn Augustson | Content Manager – CollegeRecruiter.com

Employers and schools are increasingly turning using targeted email campaigns to help them reach a highly targeted yet large groups of college students and recent graduates. The reason is that the costs per hire and speed to hire are usually awesome. Many of our clients report to us that their costs per hire are $100 to $200 when they use targeted email campaigns and they receive virtually all of their responses within just a few days. Quite simply, targeted email campaigns combine the best of job postings (high quantity of response) with the best of resume searching (high quality of response and speediness of responses).

The successfulness of targeted email campaigns depends largely upon the quality of the list, how well targeted the list is (we offer at no additional charge any combination of up to 700 fields of data such as school, major, program, GPA, year in school, graduation date, experience, hobbies, interests, diversity, and more), how well written the subject line is, how well designed the creative (the ad in the body of the email is), the quality of the offer itself, and how well designed the landing page is (the page on the site of the employer or school to which candidates click th