CollegeRecruiter.com Blog


Search Jobs

What: job title or keywords

Where: city, state



Search Content

Career-related articles, blogs, videos, podcasts, and more.





Do you have a question or comment?




ABOUT SSL CERTIFICATES

« December 2005 | Main | February 2006 »

So you have your resume all typed up and just need someone to review it. Time to ask your friend or someone in your family, right? Wrong. Pamela Braun of Campus Career Counselor advises candidates not to have their resume reviewed by a friend or family member for two reasons.


  1. The person performing the critique knows you too well so they're too able to infer meaning. But your resume should be written in such a way that the reader need not read between the lines. Facts should be stated explicitly, not implicitly.
  2. The person performing the critique is likely to give advice based upon what they look for in a resume rather than what the employer to which you're applying will look for in a resume. Put another way, it doesn't matter if your uncle likes how your resume is written unless you're applying to work for him. What matters is how the employer to which you're applying likes to see resumes written.

Don't shut your friends and family out of your job search. They can and should be valuable members of your network and can and should provide you with great moral support. But if they don't write or read resumes for a living, then look for someone who does.

If you're looking for a job upon graduation, it is definitely helpful to know which organizations are the top (actually, the biggest) employers of college graduates. The 50 biggest employers of college graduates are as follows:


  1. Enterprise Rent-A-Car
  2. Lockheed Martin
  3. Walgreen Company
  4. PricewaterhouseCoopers
  5. Deloitte & Touche USA LLP
  6. Ernst & Young
  7. Federal Bureau of Investigation
  8. Schlumberger
  9. U.S. Department of Agriculture
  10. Cendant Car Rental Group
  11. Hertz
  12. KPMG
  13. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
  14. Boeing
  15. Teach For America
  16. Jos. A. Bank Clothiers
  17. State Street
  18. U.S. Marines
  19. 84 Lumber
  20. Intel
  21. National Security Agency
  22. Ferguson Enterprises
  23. Microsoft
  24. Wal-Mart Stores
  25. Accenture
  26. Cerner
  27. Internal Revenue Service
  28. U.S. Air Force
  29. U.S. Navy
  30. Target
  31. Finish Line
  32. General Electric
  33. Johnson & Johnson
  34. PNC Financial Services Group
  35. Countrywide Home Loans
  36. National Cancer Institute
  37. Pfizer
  38. Pulte Homes
  39. U.S. Army
  40. U.S. Department of Labor
  41. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
  42. Raytheon
  43. CareerBuilder.com
  44. Staples
  45. Capgemini
  46. Battelle
  47. Liberty Mutual Group
  48. UMB Bank
  49. Farmers Insurance Group
  50. JC Penney

    -- Source: CollegeGrad

Interesting entry today by Jessica Piskorz, one of the students and recent graduates who writes for the CollegeRecruiter.com Insights by Candidates Blog. Jessica is an English major who is unable to find a job in writing, reading, or journalism but someday would like to open her own bookstore. Her fiance suggested that she take a job in a bookstore and work her way up. Jessica doesn't seem inclined to do so, apparently because her degree makes her overqualified for such a position. Does it?

So many college students and recent graduates assume incorrectly that if they do well in their academic studies, that they'll be able to land the job of their dreams upon graduation. Were it only so. The reality is that the vast majority of employers are far more concerned with the work experience demonstrated by the candidate than the candidate's academic credentials. While both are valuable, unless you're the cream of the cream, excellent career-related work experience is going to be necessary for you to find the job of your dreams.

So should Jessica pursue a job in a bookstore? Perhaps. I think that it comes down to whether she is more interested in a journalism-type job or owning a bookstore. If she's more interested in being a journalist, then her bookstore experience won't help her that much. It may help pay the bills and that's important too, but it won't be much of a stepping stone. So she may want to work in a bookstore part-time to bring in money while also working part-time as a freelance writer. She could write and submit articles to local publications for free until she's built up a reputation and can start charging for her work or perhaps even get hired to write for a publication. On the other hand, if her dream is to own a bookstore, then working in one would be invaluable experience.

If you don't have the experience that you need to pursue your dreams, then go out and get it. Don't look for reasons why you can't do something. Look for ways that will allow you to do something. Take on an unpaid internship, volunteer, do whatever you need to do in order to get the experience that you need. Don't make excuses. Make dreams.

I read a great ebook today by Joel Cheesman. Battling Free describes the current opportunities and risks facing all classified sites, including job boards, as sites such as Google begin to run classified ads for free. According to Cheesman, "to remain competitive, it's imperative for such posting sites to reevaluate market positions, business models and evolve to find new sources of revenue."

Cheesman's book addresses these issues and offers over 25 nuts-and-bolts tips, each of which are designed to enable the site owner to raise revenues that they have, are, or will lose to sites which offer competitive content at little or no charge. But what I loved about this book is that rather than just focusing on the problem or offering vague, theoretical solutions, Cheesman dives right in and gets his hands dirty. He provides links to specific web sites that offer specific solutions to specific problems. He provides his opinions as to which of them offer more promising solutions than the others. And he doesn't pretend for one minute to have all of the answers or to possess the ability to accurately predict the future.

It was comforting to see that we have already successfully implemented many of Cheesman's tips, such as running Google AdSense code on our site to display pay-per-click text ads as well as pay-per-impression graphical ads, referring visitors to third party sites using trackable affiliate links through Commission Junction, being listed in directories such as Yahoo!, submitting articles to third party web sites, pre-selling sponsorship pages on our site to organizations which offer services which are complimentary to ours, delivering targeted emails to our users based upon their demographics rather than just a one-size-fits all monthly newsletter, encouraging employers and job seekers to pay nominal additional fees to have their jobs and resumes appear at the top of the search results, providing video content, charging for resume access, and selling complimentary services to the employers and candidates who use our site.

But even though we are successfully generating revenue through the above strategies, Cheesman's book provided me with a lot to chew on. There are substrategies in many of the above areas that we have not yet implemented and there are strategies that he recommends that we have not yet touch at all. The book is $24.99. And as stated on its web site, "just one idea pays for this investment times over."

I received confirmation yesterday that I was selected by the American College Personnel Association (ACPA) to speak about podcasting at their 2006 Annual National Convention in Indianapolis. I've been to a lot of great cities, but never Indianapolis. Any suggestions for what I should see and do?

One of the features on CollegeRecruiter.com of which I never tire is the graph on each of our career channel pages that allows you to instantly see the trend in the number of jobs and resumes which are being posted to the 6,800 niche career sites in our network. If you're following the Accounting and Finance sector, then click to our career channel home page, click on the link to Accounting & Finance, and scroll about halfway down the page. You'll see the following graph:

The two graphs use the same data. One is a line graphic and the other is a bar graph. Some people find one easier to interpret than the other, so we display both. The graphic above depicts the change in volume of Accounting & Finance job and resume postings within the last several months. As you can see, the number of jobs being posted is far more variable but overall is trending upwards with a slight recent decline. The number of resumes being posted is less variable but also overall is trending upwards with a slight recent decline.

So how do you turn that data into information? Well, employers may want to use it to determine what types of incentives they need to offer to land new hires. If the number of postings is trending upwards and the number of resumes is trending downwards, then it is reasonable to infer that there is a labor shortage and the incentives will need to be increased. On the other hand, if the number of postings is trending downwards and the number of resumes is trending upwards, the candidates should understand that there likely is a labor glut and they shouldn't expect rich incentives.

I recently wrote about Maryland's misguided social engineering efforts in their quest to force Wal-Mart to pay a higher percentage of its payroll towards healthcare costs for its employees. Although many would argue that employers should pay more, I fail to see any rationale for only forcing this upon Wal-Mart rather than all employers or perhaps all employers with more than perhaps 50 employees. Others would argue that if providing healthcare benefits to Maryland citizens is so important to the Maryland legislature, then the legislature should fund their social engineering project and follow the lead of Oregon in implementing a universal healthcare program.

Today, let's address another misguided effort by Maryland to ostensibly shift wealth from employers to employees. Maryland's legislature recently overrode the veto of Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. (R) and voted to raise the minimum wage from $5.15 to $6.15 per hour. While few would argue that more people making more money is a bad thing, the problem with increasing the minimum wage is that doing so increases the costs to employ those people. Given our increasingly interstate and even global economy, when we increase our costs of production we increase the incentive to employers to export those jobs to other states or to other countries. And even if the jobs are such that they will not be exported, the increased cost to the employer will end up being paid by consumers or the employer's shareholders or both. If by consumers, then the standard of living in Maryland just dropped. If by shareholders, then the employer's shareholders will see a lower rate of return on their investment, which will increase the cost of capital to that employer which will make it more difficult for that employer to hold the line on price increases, add new facilities, employ more people, etc.

Years ago, states could increase the minimum wage without having to worry about the negative consequences because those consequences were few and insignificant. Today, those consequences are very real and very serious. While those employees who see their pay increase by $1 per hour will no doubt rejoice, the rest of those in Maryland should be concerned. In fact, they should be very concerned about the lack of wisdom being exhibited by their elected officials.

Maryland recently passed a law requiring employers with more than 10,000 employees in the state to spend 8 percent of their payrolls on health care. Ostensibly, the goal is to reduce the number of workers in Maryland from needing to rely on Medicaid. So how many employers does this effect? You guessed it. Only one. Wal-Mart.

Although some might view Wal-Mart as the evil empire and some might suspect that my residency in Target's home state of Minnesota would pretty much require me to be one of those who view Wal-Mart as the evil empire, I do not. Like any corporation, Wal-Mart is in business to legally earn as large a profit as it can. Is forcing Wal-Mart to pay a higher percentage of its payroll on healthcare a good idea? Read on and I'm hoping that you'll agree that isn't really the point.

Clearly it is in the State of Maryland's best interests to minimize the number of its citizens who must rely on Medicaid. By reducing those counts, Maryland saves money and hopefully improves the quality of care available to its citizens. So if the goal of this law is solely to save Maryland money and move its citizens from Medicaid to private insurance, then why was it written to only ensnare Wal-Mart and not other companies? Surely the State of Maryland is concerned about its entire Medicaid budget, not just the portion of its budget tied up in providing benefits to Wal-Mart employees. And those of its citizens who are Wal-Mart employees. And surely the State of Maryland is concerned about all of its citizens, not just those who work for Wal-Mart. Some might say that small employers can't afford to pay healthcare costs. But even if that is true, is Wal-Mart the only large organization in Maryland. Of course not. Is it the only organization that can afford to pay for healthcare for its employees? Of course not. Is it the only organization that can be accused of not paying enough of the healthcare expenses for its employees? Of course not. So what is the point of the law?

Quite simply, the Maryland legislature understands economics enough to know that it should not attempt to impose healthcare costs on employers doing business within Maryland because those added costs will result in lower employment within Maryland. Businesses in Maryland do not exist in a vacuum. If their costs are higher, consumers will buy less and the employers will need fewer employees. Yet the legislators also know that Wal-Mart is, unfortunately, a favorite whipping boy right now. So the legislators can impose these costs on Big Bad Wal-Mart and win votes and favors from many quarters. They may be short-sighted enough to impose such an uneven law on Wal-Mart, but they aren't stupid enough to impose it on all businesses or even most large businesses in Maryland.

If Maryland really wanted to reduce the number of employed workers on Medicaid, then it could and should have tightened the eligibility standards for Medicaid. Maryland could simply have created a law stating that those making as much income as Wal-Mart provides its workers would be ineligible for Medicaid benefits. While the wisdom of such a law would still be open to debate, at least it would be fair as it would apply to workers at all organizations and not just those who work for Wal-Mart.

Recently, a client asked me to share with them some recommendations for making their planned targeted email campaign work as well as possible. CollegeRecruiter.com has a targeted email database of 100 million candidates, of which 8.5 million are students and recent graduates, and we deliver multiple targeted emails on behalf of our clients almost every week.

These guidelines are designed to ensure that your opt-in email campaigns go as smoothly as possible.

General Guidelines

- It is highly recommended that a plain text version be included with every HTML campaign to insure compatibility with all email clients.

Plain Text Emails

It is important to the success of your campaign that your message be short, to the point, and include a special offer or time-sensitive promotion. Allow your website to further emphasize your messages and promotions.

- Text must be ASCII text (12 pt. Arial Font). No colors, no bold, no italics, and all one size.

- If you want the lines to look the same on each different computer they are viewed on, you should use a hard return (press the enter key on your keyboard) at the end of each line.

HTML Emails

- Research shows that response rates to emails decrease dramatically with email of more than 12k in size.

- Use a program created specifically to manage html (i.e., Dreamweaver or FrontPage). Do not use Microsoft Word or other word processor to build or modify creatives because they will build HTML code that is not compatible with many email clients.

- Use simple HTML. Do not use, Java, Javascript, DHTML, CSS (Cascading Style Sheets), Active X, meta-tags or any similar extension, plug-in or language. If you want to add movement you might want to consider using .gif files. The reason is that many email clients can only interpret simple HTML and some ISPs even block messages that have scripts.

- Use colored tables to simulate backgrounds. Do not use the background property of the body tag. Do not use graphics as backgrounds for tables. The reason is that most web-based email services already have a background set in their pages that will override the information set in the body tag of the creative.

- Do not embed forms in the creative. Reason: Web-based email services use forms on their pages. It could create conflicts.

- Do not use many images. Keep the weight of the creative in bytes as small as you can. Use text instead of graphics whenever is possible. The reason is that a standard dial-up connection, which is how most people still connect from home, takes one second to download each 3kb. Most of the email should be loaded during the first four (4) seconds to catch the attention of the user.

- Design creatives that can be seen in screens with low resolutions. Creatives 480 pixels wide or narrower are a good choice. That's the width of a standard banner ad. The reason for using this width is that most computers have resolutions of 640x480 or 800x600. Most email programs and web-services use a section of the screen to display menus, thus leaving only a small section of the screen to see the message.

- Use error-free HTML. Check the creative with the free W3C Validator Service (http://validator.w3.org/). Test the creative with Internet Explorer and Netscape. The reason is that the W3C (The World Wide Web Consortium) develops interoperable technologies for the web, including HTML specifications. Most developers use their standards to create HTML interpreters.

Spam Filters

Be sure that your email vendor works closely with all of the major consumer Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to help ensure that their emails are whitelisted and not blocked at the ISP level as being suspected spam. We do. We also are 100 percent opt-in and CAN-SPAM compliant, but some anti-spam software filter programs don't know that. So it is important for you to build creative that does not look spammy to the filters. Avoid the use of words such as "free," "offer," and "opportunity" that are frequently used by spammers. Avoid using only one image for your creative, as those types of creatives are frequently used by spammers. Before sending your creatives to your seed list, run the creative through a software program such as Spam Assassin ( http://spamassassin.apache.org/ ) that will provide you with feedback as to whether the creative will look spammy to the filters and why.

Great article in today's ER Daily by Lou Adler regarding how employers can best advertise their job openings. Lou had a number of great tips. Below are summaries of them along with some of my own comments:

1. Stop using traditional job descriptions as the basis for your advertising. If you only focus on your needs and wants, the only candidates who will apply will be those who are the most desperate to be hired. Not exactly your star candidates. Write your job descriptions to attract the stars and repel the most desperate.

2. Stop using a classified-ad mentality. Target the up-and-comers by using media that they use and stay away from the media primarily used by the down-and-outers.

3. Make the job compelling. In the first paragraph, sell the candidate on why this is the best job for them. That is very different from describing their job duties and requirements.

4. Don't start with the part number. Yawn! The first two lines are critical to capturing their interest. Make them compelling.

5. Track your results.

6. Use new media. Use instant messaging, podcasts and alternative communication channels. Teens, college students, and recent grads use text messaging as their primary means of communication. Email is, like, so yesterday. It seems that almost every college student now has an iPod or other MP3 player. Are you still struggling to get your postings on-line? Hire an intern to help you bridge the technology and mental barrier between on-line electronic media such as the web and email and off-line electronic media such as text messaging to cell phones and podcasting.

7. Use creative titles targeted to your audience. And if you just can't bring yourself to be that different, then at least use job titles which are meaningful to the candidate rather than just those who already work for your organization.

8. Use search engine optimization techniques.

9. Make it viral. If you do all of this stuff, people will be willing to refer other people to your jobs. So ask them to do so and make it easy for them to do so by adding "Tell a Friend" and other such features to your postings.

I'm pleased to announce that the winner of our 2005 contest for a free Dell Dimension 300 desktop computer and 15 inch flat panel monitor is Heather Janes.

I had the pleasure of meeting Heather yesterday when I presented the computer to her. While I wish that we had the budget to provide a free computer to all of the entrants, but we don't so they're just going to have to ask Heather if they can borrow her computer every once in a while. I'm sure that she won't have any problem with that. After all, who wouldn't want to share their computer with thousands of strangers?

Congratulations, Heather!

If you're a student, recent graduate, millenial, Y-gen member, or all of the above, then you've definitely heard of FaceBook and probably used it. FaceBook has grown from nothing just a few short years ago to huge today, and it continues to grow in leaps and bounds. So what is it?

FaceBook is a social networking site, somewhat like MySpace and many of the others, but it is THE social networking site for college students. And should be. Working with many of the colleges and universities across the country, FaceBook has created a network of sites with each site being specific to each school. To gain access to a FaceBook site for a particular school, you need to have a valid university email address. So students, staff, faculty, and sometimes alumni can access their own school's FaceBook site, but they will have only very limited access to the FaceBook sites at other schools.

FaceBook has become so popular that its name is used as a verb. Students talk about "FaceBooking" someone to find out more about them because a large number of students at each of their schools will register and enter information about themselves. They can then use that information to find people on-campus with similar interests. If you're really into hockey (either you are or you will be someday), then you can find others on-campus who are also interested in hockey. If you're an electrical engineer, you can network with other electrical engineers. Sounds pretty benign so far, right? Right. But here's where FaceBook can become a foe.

Some students mistakenly believe that FaceBook is only used by other students and only for social reasons. Wrong. FaceBook is also being used by a very small number of web savvy employers to help them conduct background checks on applicants. Say you're a student at XYZ College and you apply to work for ABC Company. In all likelihood, someone at ABC Company attends or is an alumni of XYZ College. A recruiter can simply ask that person to log into FaceBook, pull up your profile, and look at your profile. If your profile is benign, no problem. But if your profile contains information about your dating practices, illegal activities, and other such controversial or problematic issues, then at best the recruiter is going to have some questions for you that will be difficult to answer and at worst they'll simply decline to hire you.

So, should you stay away from FaceBook and sites like it? Absolutely not. They're great. But like anything else good in life, they should be used in moderation and with care. Simply put, don't post information on-line anywhere that you would want to keep secret from anyone at anytime in your life.

Some words are rich in meaning. Just one word says so many things. Just one word says so much about the speaker. Just word can send you into job seeker neverland, sometimes never to be seen again. There was one young woman who, in attempting to speak in the current vernacular, told her 40-years(+) senior that their thinking was retarded. The comment has come and gone. The young woman had some sleepless nights wondering whether she would be allowed to continue her relationship. Many still seethe when they hear her name and wish her the worst.

"Retarded" is one of those words in the GenY (or is it Z?) vocabulary and is supposedly vey hip. It is not. And there are a few others that need to get weeded out of the personal vocabulary to boost one's viability and promotability to a higher level.

Retarded - We've given this some short shrift (that is to say summary, scant attention). To tell someone they are retarded is tantamount to insulting them. You've just told them they are not bright, or they are dumb, not capable of learning, are slow, or that they are stupid. No matter what interpretation, this is definitely not a compliment. Unless you're talking about some machinery that's just started running in slow mode or a task that needs to be completed and is going very slowly, chances are using this word will get you out of the running.

Stupid - Usually used in the context, "He's stupid," or "She's stupid," or "That's stupid." The expression really is a real turn-off. Put in normal wording, it's saying that the person is not bright and not capable. In the new generation vernacular, they're saying that whatever just happened was a little silly. That's not what comes across to all generations and that's definitely not what comes across to someone for whom English is not the native language. What could be substituted? "That's a little odd." "Well, that's different." "Tha's so funny." (Please DO NOT use a condescending tone here.) "There could be a little more thought about this." Another way to say this is, "That's really unique," or just, "Hum. Could you tell me a little more about that?"

Shut Up - What it intends to say is, "That's totally outrageous!" "Oh, you've shocked me. Don't say anything else." "That was too funny. Stop it!" What it says to all generations is very insulting. It says, don't speak because your words have little value and the listener doesn't want to hear them.

Crazy - This is also a loaded term. It can be used to convey that something is a little off the beaten track. It could also be saying that someone is a complete lunatic, not functioning in reality, and should be given no credibility. If said about someone, it could be deemed defamatory and the speaker could be held liable for damages. "That's crazy," could be said in reference to some idea or concept that is completely incredible, totally unfeasible. But if you don't have a lot of experience, it's best to leave that judgement to those who do have experience and wait to hear the explanation of how the idea is to work. If you refuse to listen to the explanation, then be prepared to give some good, solid analysis about why your theory would work better, complete with examples and supporting facts.

Bro' - This is a shortened form of "brother" usually reserved for those who feel a closeness to the one with whom they're speaking. It's usually in reference to similarity in race, background, ethnicity, or experience. This is a very familiar term. It's best not to use it with a customer, a potential employer, a recruiter, an instructor, or a coach.

Yeah - Oh what a word! It's a word of affirmation or agreement. It's also slang and colloquial. It's informal English. It's a real turn off to employers. Save it for the game or the dance floor or the rock concert. Lose it for the workplace.

Fool - This one is right up there with "stupid," "retarded." and "bro'." Have we beaten this horse to death yet?

Uh-huh - An expression just a cut above Cro Magnon. It really means "yes" without having to bob your head up and down. Formal English. Use formal English when speaking with employers, customers, professionals, quasi-professionals, receptionists, strangers, ...

Sweetie - Do you want to see someone's toes curl? Do you want to see how fast you can make a woman want to smack you in the face and walk away while you lie in the dust wondering what wall just fell on you? Try calling her (no matter what age) "sweetie." It's belittling. It's insulting. It says she doesn't have a lot on the ball and is childlike. She is not a professional and should be treated as though like a toy.

Other Losers; Explanations Not Necessary

- Honey

- Sweetheart

- Cutie

- Girl

- Hunk

- Baby

What this is actually showing is that your vocabulary needs to be as professional as possible in order for you to be considered ....

Careerbuilder just announced the launch of a new web site cbcampus.com, a job board that will target college students and recent graduates. While many would ask whether the entrance of a new competitor into our niche worries me, I can only answer that it adds no new worries. There are 40,000 job boards. This is one of the most competive yet collegial industries out there. As is the case in many industries, it is a small world. Many of us know each other, respect each other, like each other, work with each other, partner with each other, and compete against each other.

Is there room for another premium college job board? That's kind of like asking if there is room for another pizza restaurant. There is always room for another well run organization of any kind. The well run organizations tend to do two things: steal business from those which are poorly run and increase the overall amount of business available to everyone. So what keeps me up at night is wondering what else we can do to be as good as we can be for the candidates, employers, schools, and others who use our site. I know that if we perform well, then we will continue to grow and profit. We don't need to steal business from our competitors to do that, but sometimes we do and sometimes they do. And that's just healthy competition.

For those of us in the northern hemisphere, the middle of January usually brings thoughts of trying to stay warm, catching a hockey game, curling up with a good book by the fire, trying to figure out a way of paying the credit card bills from our holiday shopping spree and, of course, getting our resumes in shape.

Huh? Resumes in January? For those who are looking for an internship, this is the beginning of the peak season. While internships are available year-round, the bulk of the most sought after internships run from June through August and the hiring for those internships commences in January and runs through April.

So if you're looking for an internship, look now. A quick look at our exclusive internship job posting page revealed about 75 postings for internships. Some are paid and some are unpaid. According to a recent National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE) study, 98 percent of their member organizations report that they pay their interns and that the average pay is $15.44 per hour. But NACE's membership is heavily skewed to large organizations. I haven't seen any surveys of all types of internships, but based upon my conversations with students and employers, I estimate that about half of internships are paid and the remaining half are unpaid.

Students who are not successful in landing a paid internship or who don't want such an internship to begin with often ask if they are better off taking a non-career related position that primarily offers good pay or a career-related internship that primarily offers good experience. The answer? If there is any way possible for them to make it work financially, always take the position that offers the best experience. The few thousand dollars that you might give up in the short-term will be one of the best investments that make in yourself in the long-term. With better experience, you'll have a much easier time upon graduation landing a great job. You'll find a better job faster, so the lost income you suffer now will come back to you many times over within just a few years of graduation.

It seems so simple -- to be the leading organization in your field, you must have the best people working for you. But how do you attract and retain the people who truly make a difference when the business of recruiting students and recent graduates is so competitive? CollegeRecruiter.com, the highest traffic career site used by college students and recent graduates and the employers who want to hire them, invites organizations to shine a light on their best and brightest recruiting and retaining ideas, as well as the ideas that did not meet expectations. Whether the idea is new and innovative or tried and true, Steven Rothberg, President and Founder of CollegeRecruiter.com, wants to learn about the methods employers use to improve their recruitment and retention of college hires.

To remain competitive, businesses of all sizes and across all industries must develop and implement creative programs and strategies to recruit and retain top candidates while retaining and motivating current employees. Most human resource managers feel that workforce recruitment and retention is a primary concern because of the slowly improving economy, higher demand for workers, and a workforce that has become confident in their ability to seek and obtain alternative employment.

As the talent pool shrinks, it is imperative that immediate action is taken to ensure businesses are properly prepared and staffed for the future. “In this environment, college recruiting managers need to do everything that they can to improve their recruitment and retention practices and a great way to do that is to benchmark their practices against those of other organizations,” said Rothberg. “That’s why CollegeRecruiter.com is creating a section on our site entitled Employer Case Studies: What Works for America’s Top College Recruiters.”

By participating in this new case study program, your organization will receive considerable added and free exposure to the hundreds of thousands of college students and recent graduates who use CollegeRecruiter.com every year. All employers are encouraged to take part in this new case study program as participation is free and the added publicity is priceless. Just like its podcasts and existing library of over 1,500 content rich pages of articles and Ask the Experts questions and answers, CollegeRecruiter.com intends to charge no fee to visitors who want to read the case studies.

To participate, please email Steven Rothberg with specific information about your recruitment and retention strategies. While the information that you include is up to you, CollegeRecruiter.com would like to receive information about how your organization institutes retention activities, implements specific workforce growth goals and recruitment strategies, and uses organizational resources and marketing materials in its recruitment efforts. The more information that you provide, the more likely it is that CollegeRecruiter.com will accept your offer to participate in the case study program. CollegeRecruiter.com will promote all accepted case studies in its award-winning CollegeRecruiter.com Blog and in its widely distributed press releases and articles.

If you're searching for the right college or grad school, there are an overwhelming number of resources from which to choose. Books, web sites, brochures, emails, parents, friends, drunk guys in alley ways, etc. A great resource is the CollegeRecruiter.com School Finder, which asks you a few easy questions and then matches your interests with the offerings of hundreds of public and private on-line and traditional colleges and graduate schools. Regardless of which resource you use, however, you always want to weigh each school against its closest competitors. A great way to do that is to use Kiplinger's annual list of top public colleges as measured by their value.

So which are the top schools? Some are no surprise because of the superb education that they offer to their students, such as this year's top pick, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Other schools will be more surprising, especially for those who believe that everything west of the Hudson River and east Los Angeles is "fly over" country.

The list of the best 100 post-secondary colleges, universities, and grad schools by value are:

1 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
2 University of Florida
3 University of Virginia
4 The College of William and Mary
5 New College of Florida
6 University of Georgia
7 State University of New York College at Geneseo
8 University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign
9 State University of New York at Binghamton
10 University of Washington
11 University of California, San Diego
12 University of California, Berkeley
13 University of Delaware
14 University of California, Los Angeles
15 University of Wisconsin - Madison
16 University of Michigan
17 James Madison University
18 University of Maryland, College Park
19 The College of New Jersey
20 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
21 Florida State University
22 University of Mary Washington
23 Truman State University
24 Clemson University
25 Texas A&M University
26 University of Colorado at Boulder
27 The University of Texas at Austin
28 North Carolina State University
29 University of Connecticut
30 Georgia Institute of Technology
31 University of South Carolina
32 The University of North Carolina at Wilmington
33 Appalachian State University
34 Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick/Piscataway
35 Stony Brook University, State University of New York
36 University of Wisconsin - La Crosse
37 St. Mary's College of Maryland
38 Miami University
39 Purdue University
40 University of Central Florida
41 New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
42 University of Pittsburgh
43 The Pennsylvania State University University Park Campus
44 University of California, Santa Barbara
45 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
46 University at Albany, State University of New York
47 The University of Iowa
48 The University of Tennessee
49 Florida International University
50 The University of North Carolina at Asheville
51 Colorado School of Mines
52 Indiana University Bloomington
53 Mississippi University for Women
54 Murray State University
55 University of Minnesota, Morris
56 College of Charleston
57 Millersville University of Pennsylvania
58 University of California, Davis
59 University of California, Santa Cruz
60 University of Missouri - Columbia
61 State University of New York, Fredonia
62 Salisbury University
63 University of Missouri - Rolla
64 University of Oklahoma
65 University of Vermont
66 The University of Texas at Dallas
67 University of Kansas
68 The University of Alabama
69 University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire
70 University of California, Irvine
71 Iowa State University of Science and Technology
72 University of Arkansas
73 Colorado State University
74 University of Nebraska - Lincoln
75 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro
76 University of Kentucky
77 University at Buffalo, The State University of New York
78 University of Hawaii at Manoa
79 The Ohio State University
80 University of New Hampshire
81 University of Massachusetts Amherst
82 Auburn University
83 Illinois State University
84 State University of New York at Plattsburgh
85 Kansas State University
86 The University of Arizona
87 Ramapo College of New Jersey
88 Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania
89 Oklahoma State University
90 State University of New York at New Paltz
91 Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
92 Georgia College & State University
93 Mississippi State University
94 Michigan State University
95 Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania
96 Washington State University
97 University of Northern Iowa
98 University of Utah
99 Rowan University
100 University of Oregon

Fortune Magazine just released its annual survey of the top 100 employers to work for. While there are many household names on the list, there were also a number of surprises. Indeed, of the top 10 companies, only half are what most people would regard as being well known.

  1. Genentech
  2. Wegmans Food Markets
  3. Valero Energy
  4. Griffin Hospital
  5. W.L. Gore & Associates
  6. Container Store
  7. Vision Service Plan
  8. J.M. Smucker
  9. Recreational Equipment (REI)
  10. S.C. Johnson
  11. Boston Consulting Group
  12. Plante & Moran
  13. Quicken Loans
  14. HomeBanc Mortgage
  15. Whole Foods Market
  16. Edward Jones
  17. Republic Bancorp
  18. Baptist Health Care
  19. Alston & Bird
  20. Kimley-Horn & Associates
  21. QuikTrip
  22. American Century Investments
  23. Qualcomm
  24. David Weekley Homes
  25. Cisco Systems
  26. Goldman Sachs
  27. Network Appliance
  28. Four Seasons
  29. Starbucks
  30. SAS Institute
  31. Robert W. Baird
  32. Alcon Laboratories
  33. Nugget Markets
  34. CDW
  35. American Fidelity Assurance
  36. TDIndustries
  37. American Express
  38. Milliken
  39. Amgen
  40. JM Family Enterprises
  41. Timberland
  42. Microsoft
  43. Intuit
  44. Pella
  45. SRA International
  46. Nordstrom
  47. AFLAC
  48. Perkins Coie
  49. Nixon Peabody
  50. Northwest Community Hospital
  51. Genzyme
  52. Eli Lilly
  53. Hot Topic
  54. Arnold & Porter
  55. Station Casinos
  56. Publix Super Markets
  57. Synovus
  58. Stew Leonard's
  59. Baptist Health South Florida
  60. Vanguard Group
  61. Sherwin-Williams
  62. Memorial Health
  63. Russell Investment Group
  64. FedEx
  65. PCL Construction
  66. MITRE
  67. Ernst & Young
  68. Bronson Healthcare Group
  69. Valassis
  70. A.G. Edwards
  71. PricewaterhouseCoopers
  72. Booz Allen Hamilton
  73. Yahoo
  74. Standard Pacific
  75. Quad/Graphics
  76. Children's Heathcare of Atlanta
  77. National Instruments
  78. Methodist Hospital System
  79. East Penn Manufacturing
  80. CH2M Hill
  81. Autodesk
  82. Bingham McCutchen
  83. Texas Instruments
  84. Worthington Industries
  85. First Horizon National
  86. Principal Financial Group
  87. Washington Mutual
  88. Morrison & Foerster
  89. Mayo Clinic
  90. John Wiley & Sons
  91. Granite Construction
  92. Men's Wearhouse
  93. CarMax
  94. Bright Horizons
  95. Wm. Wrigley Jr.
  96. IKEA (U.S.)
  97. Intel
  98. General Mills
  99. Marriott International
  100. Nike

Interesting post recently by Universities Weblog about reference letters. Although most students have very similiar credentials, the post makes the point that what can often separate them out are reference letters, but many of those letters have taken on vague language that would make even the most skillful of Supreme Court nominees

Many professors and others on-campus will agree to write letters of reference for their students, but advice their students that their letters will have a greater impact if the writer sends the letter directly to the employer. The letter writer is therefore free to be more candid than they might be if the letter was first read by the candidate. Yet even though the letter is going to directly to the employer, many of the writers are increasingly choosing to use double speak when describing their students. For example, rather than describing Tommy as a poor student, the writer will state that Tommy works to the best of his abilities. Or rather than describing Sally as being cruel, the writer will state that Sally has few friends. So it isn't so much what they're writing, as what they're not writing.

Students and other job seekers: before you ask a professor or anyone else for a letter of reference, be sure to ask them whether it will be positive. Ask them to be candid with you and then listen carefully both to what they say and what they don't say. If they clearly indicate that they will provide you with a glowing reference, awesome. But if they tell you that they can say some nice things or that they wish that they knew you better, take the hint. For however vague that hint is, they're trying to tell you something by not telling you something.

"The white man has been holding me back."

"I can't get promoted because they're prejudiced against [whatever race]."

"They just don't hire [fill in minority race]. They're the first to get fired for the most flimsy reason."

Well, so much for myths and misconceptions.

It's interesting to walk among people of all ages, economic and social circumstances, and races and hear the multitudes of reasons why they cannot succeed. No matter what the accent or color of skin, the excuses fall into basically the same three lines of reasoning.

Very rarely do any of them take the time to take a good, long, hard look at the person who is presenting themselves to the employer. Few do a self-critical analysis of their work performance. And even fewer have considered what it takes to succeed.

There was a career fair about three years ago where one attendee demanded information from the panel of experts. The audience and panel listened with due respect and attention and answered all questions that were presented. But at one juncture, a panelist whispered to another a sorrowful observation that the attendee's grammar was so excruciatingly poor. Given that the career fair was for paraprofessionals, there was speculation that the extraordinarily poor grammar was feigned. "Given how much there is, I don't think so," was the reply.

Did that career fair attendee realize that the lack of appreciation and use of good grammar was one of the things that was holding their career in a dead zone? Probably not. Did that career fair attendee understand that poor diction, improper choice or words, lack of tact and diplomacy, poor sentence construction, were all red flags that their work product would probably show a great deal of lack of attention to details, be slipshod in quality, and overall the candidate would probably be poor in overall work habits and client interaction.

These are just the objections associated with poor grammar. There are so many other issues that can blow you out of the workforce water.

Couldn't make the interview because of the flu. Well, it may be a legitimate reason. Then again, it may be an excuse because you just didn't want to get out of bed and get ready on time. Or it may be that you were too hung over. No matter. What it says to the employer is that you're not reliable. And if it's just the interview you can't make, no doubt the attendance record will be abyssmal. This will be a pass.

Try this same stunt with a placement agency (temp agency). One agency owner confided in me that he can tell the race, gender, and age of a candidate based on the excuses they use for not showing up. There was no mention of their postal zip code, which is typically considered fodder for racial exclusion. According to that professional, it was the candidate themselves who was their own undoing.

It would be easy to go on with even more examples of why mere race is not the reason for losing the opportunity. But that would be gilding the lily. The basic idea stands. It is the candidate theirself who is their own undoing.

Tighten up your act. Better yet, be a class act in good performance.

I'm often asked by students and recent graduates how they should find an internship, seasonal position, or entry level career opportunity. They want to know what field is "hot," what opportunites pay the most, and what is "best." Well, what is hot today isn't all that relevant because it likely won't be hot a couple of years from now. The highest paying opportunities are also usually the ones with the lowest job satisfaction ratings. And what is best for me isn't necessary best for you or anyone else.

So let's re-phrase the question. What career path is the best for the particular candidate? It depends upon the candidate's competencies, interests, and values. Examine what you're good at, what you like, and what is important to you. Look for common themes. Then look at industries that are consistent with those themes. Within those industries, find organizations that are consistent with those themes. Within those organizations, find departments or divisions. And within those, find hiring managers. Then network.

If you are fortunate enough to have multiple job offers, if there is any way possible to make it work financially, take the one that offers the greatest experience. I agree with Steven Sinofsky of Microsoft TechTalk in that it is critical to your ability to enjoy your life that you work for an organization that offers you great experience, allows you to do work that you love, and that the services or products that you're helping to produce are delivered for reasons that are in line with your beliefs. Put another way, competencies, interests, and values.

Should a rejection be communicated via telephone voice mail? Well, if you want the equivalent of, "I just called to tell you that your mother [or insert title of any other significant in your life] died," then go ahead and leave that type of voice message. However, an employer of any quality would not do so.

The better move is to leave a voice message to the effect that you're following up on the interview of xx days ago and would appreciate a call. Voice tone should be positive because, after all, this may be a person you will either refer to an affiliate organization or call back for another opportunity that comes up at a later time.

The drawback with telephone call rejections is the need to keep the conversation going in order to overcome the discomfort of being the communicator of bad news. It's best not to draw out the conversation. Are there any questions the applicant / candidate has? Are there any beneficial pointers that would provide this person with just the right edge on the next go-round? This is the time for the extended conversation -- to convey that sort of information.

Some rejections sound as though they're canned. Trust me. Those are the truly difficult to swallow. The candidate will be rolling their eyes at the enunciation of each and every syllable. The cough you hear on the other side of the telephone receiver (cell phone earpiece) is the candidate either vomiting in disgust or suppressing it -- not sobs of dismay.

Some employers have the impression that new job seekers and recent grads have proliferate job offers that they in fact are rejecting. Now, let's get a little more realistic. We are only, in the last four months or so, just begun to emerge from what I termed the New Millennium Depression. No one is (or at least very few are) rejecting offers.

Judging from what I've seen for quite a while, people have been waiting for months to hear absolutely any word from the potential employer. Their follow-up calls have gone unanswered. The candidate is wondering if the business still exists or if the interviewer still works there. It's a good idea to communicate with the candidate in some form, be it voice message asking that they call, email rejection (which is pretty much the standard form of letter writing these days), or formal letter on company letterhead. Especially so if they have gone through at least a couple of interviews, whether by phone or in person, the person deserves to know what has happened. Let them know. They'll respect you and your organization.

There are some arguments about whether entry-level positions should receive any notice that the candidate has been rejected. Please. Every person (unless the axe murderer) deserves some form of feedback and closure. Perhaps a canned email message would be appropriate, especially if their application was through your corporate website application. Whatever means, make it cost and time effective but let them know so that they can move on in a positive way.

Does one level of candidate deserve feedback over another? Every person has feelings. Not everyone has the same amount of resilience. No matter what the position of level of attainment, the candidate wants to be treated with respect. Please don't hold out any carrots of hope if there are none. That's misleading, and unfairly so.

Treat the candidate as though they were the runner in a fair race. They will appreciate your tastefulness. It will lend toward developing goodwill and potential referrals from the one you rejected.

The United States Army is like a business. It faces the same challenges -- of recruitment and retention, of productivity, of mission -- that all businesses face, and these common threads present both the Army and the private sector with opportunities to learn from each other and to move forward in ways that can benefit everyone.

Full disclosure: the U.S. Army is a client of CollegeRecruiter.com but did not request, know of, or participate in the writing of this article.

The enlisted force is the backbone of the U.S. Army, and the Army makes every effort to retain its best people. For years, there has been a significant concern in many circles around the negative impact on recruitment resulting from the war in Iraq and continued engagements in other hot spots around the world, including Afghanistan, South Korea, Kosovo, and many, many others. But apparently, the Army has found ways to battle turnover rates and retain its soldiers. Over the last three years, re-enlistment rates have been at least six percent higher than the Army’s goals. The troops re-enlist knowing they will return to Iraq and other hotspots and once again be risking their lives. Are they doing it for the money, the glamour, the prestige? Well, the Army is paying its people bonuses for re-enlisting, but I think that few would argue that anyone fighting the war in Iraq is going to stay in the Army for a few thousand dollars more a year.

What is it that the Army is doing so right and what can corporations learn from the Army’s ability to retain its personnel despite those people being forced to be able from their families for months or even years at a time, sleeping on the ground, and constantly dodging improvised explosive devices (IEDs), bullets, mortars, and scorpions? Why is that so many organizations, which do not ask their people to risk their lives, are having significant problems retaining the most talented and productive employees? This failure to retain the most talented and productive employees – the stars that drive the success of any organization – costs small employers thousands of dollars a year in lost knowledge and experience. And for large organizations, the price is even steeper at millions of dollars, year after year.

Does your organization suffer from high personnel turnover? If so, you are certainly not alone. You are not the only one left in the dark, wondering why you’re continually losing your workforce. “While most organizations want to blame turnover on wages and benefits, they actually do not play a major role in why people leave their jobs,” according to an Entrepreneur.com article entitled “How to Prevent Employee Turnover: A look at the top three reasons employees leave a company—and what you can do to correct the problems.”

If the above statement made in the Entrepreneur.com article is true and if the Army is like a business, then there must be other reasons for the strong re-enlistment rates besides the unprecedented bonuses.
Maybe it can be attributed to the quality of today’s service members. I’ve been working with Army recruiting experts for 10 years, and I’ve always been impressed by their dedication, strategy and vision. They know where their best soldiers come from. They focus on hiring the best, not just generating leads. They’re not afraid to take chances and try out new ways of connecting with and engaging their target market, as seen by their use of pay-per-lead programs with job boards such as CollegeRecruiter.com. They understand that retention is a full employment life cycle that starts right from the first contact with their potential new recruit and continues until after that service member has completed their service. And in some cases, Army recruiters maintain contact with service members for years after they have completed their service, not because the recruiters expect the service members to re-enlist, but because the recruiters understand the power of the networking. Many employers today do not start thinking about initiating retention efforts until it’s too late.

Maybe the Army’s retention rates can be attributed to the increased sense of duty possessed by today’s all volunteer force. While testifying at a committee hearing titled “Your Troops: Their Story,” leaders said that soldiers re-enlist because they believe in the mission they are performing. Serving their country is the passion of re-enlisting soldiers. “These guys and gals are in it for the fight,” said Brig. General John F. Kelly. “That’s where they want to be and what they want to do.”

Without a sense of purpose, the Army would not be what it is today. If you’re not providing your employees with a sense of purpose and if you’re not motivating them to take pride in the work they are performing for your company, then chances are your employees are becoming bored. Bored employees do not make for lasting employees.

Maybe soldiers are re-enlisting because of the strong support and recognition they are receiving. In an American Forces Information Service news article, Army Command Sgt. Maj. Neil Ciotola said, “Soldiers understand that they have the backing of elected officials and from most of the American public, and they don’t ask for anything more. All they want is support and a sense of camaraderie.” High re-enlistment rates in units that have deployed multiple times can be attributed to the camaraderie that forms between soldiers who have been in combat together. Many of these bonds last a lifetime.

What is your employee’s work environment truly like? The only thing your employees may want is more support and teamwork. While money is important, employees are more motivated by thoughtful, personal, and creative recognition that comes directly from their supervisors and managers. In fact, surveys consistently show that more than 40 percent of people who quit do so because they feel they weren’t appreciated for their contributions. These surveys show that lack of appreciation, lack of teamwork, and the perception that the company doesn’t care about employees are consistently the highest rated reasons for low job satisfaction. Numerous studies show that motivation is especially stronger if your recognition creates a story the employee can tell to family, friends, and associates for years to come.

Like a business, the Army has significant recruiting challenges as well. Although the re-enlistment rate is certainly good news, the Army is still well short of its recruiting goals for the year. Members of the Army are also saying they are more likely to think twice about re-enlisting because of the consistently long work hours and not the prolonged deployments or life-threatening combat duty, according to a new RAND study. The recent study found that active duty troops who often put in longer work hours than normal -- either at a desk or in combat -- feel greater stress. The study also mentioned as stress levels and workdays rise, their inclination to re-enlist slips.

To know and understand why your employees stay, why they leave, and how you can become or remain an employer of choice is vital to the success of your business. Learning what works and what doesn’t from one of America’s oldest institutions can help guide your way to success. Remember, the Army faces the same challenges -- of recruitment, retention, productivity, and mission -- that all businesses face, and these common threads present both the Army and the private sector with opportunities to learn from each other and to move forward in ways that can benefit everyone.

The U.S. Department of Labor just reported that 108,000 net new jobs were created in December, which was significantly less than analysts had predicted. While most would celebrate the news of 108,000 jobs being created, the analysts were actually disappointed. Yet they were quite pleased by a related report from the Department. Although December's numbers were less than anticipated, the Department reported that it has revised upwards November's job growth from 215,000 to 305,000 new jobs.

The gains in November and December allowed the Administration to trumpet the fact that the economy added two million jobs from 1/1/05 through 12/31/05. "As we begin 2006, we have every reason to be optimistic," said Treasury Secretary John Snow. "Making the President's tax cuts permanent is the most important thing that we can do in the coming months to make sure the economic environment in 2006 is as healthy and as good for job-seekers as it was in 2005."

So what does this mean for the average job seeker? Well, with apologies to my vegan friends, the report is great meat for the conversations of those job seekers who are also into politics. But more importantly, for those who are searching for a new job or who are considering searching for a new job, the news is great. Although the labor market is no where as hot as it was in the late 1990's, it is strong when compared to long-term historical averages. And the widespread adoption of technology has created better opportunities for self-employment than have existed since the start of the Industrial Age. Those who are self-employed are not included in the Labor Department statistics, so the unemployment rate of 4.9 percent (down from five percent in November) likely understates the strength of the economy.

The bottom line: the labor market is strong, but not as robust as it has been or perhaps will be. If you're looking for a new job or considering looking for a new job, this is as good a time as you'll likely see for months and perhaps years.

The good folks over at Exceler8ion recently posted a blog entry in which they argued that targeted email campaigns were a huge missed opportunity for many employers in 2005. I couldn't agree more. Targeted email campaigns aren't dead as some believe. To the contrary, they're thriving.

Perhaps the most significant reason that early email marketing campaigns often failed was that advertisers did not properly target the intended recipients. For about five years, we've been using targeted email campaigns to help the employers hire candidates from CollegeRecruiter.com. That part of our business has been growing astronomically and is now much bigger than job postings and resume searching.

Employers which are looking to hire one or two people are usually not well served by targeted email campaigns because the costs are too high. But those which are looking to hire dozens, hundreds, or even thousands are unlikely to find a better medium. Within a few days, they can reach tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of targeted candidates. Targeted email vendors that work closely with the consumer ISPs have a high deliverability rate so ISP-level spam filters aren't an issue.

The bottom line for employers is their cost per hire and that's very low for properly targeted email campaigns. We typically see about 15 percent of the emails being opened (read), which is about three times the industry average, and about 15 percent of those turn into click throughs. Employers typically see about 20 percent of the clicks turning into applications (leads) and they hire about five to 10 percent of those. When you work through the math, the cost per hire tends to be $100 to $200, which is VERY inexpensive when compared to the cost of newspaper advertising. In addition, the time to hire is excellent, as virtually all of the responses occur within just a few days.

So are targeted email campaigns dead? Far from it. They're thriving and should be.

Dan Janal's PR Leads has a very interesting entry today. Seems that Dan and his wife, who are friends of mine, were in Las Vegas and found their way into a fancy Italian restaurant. After dinner, they were offered cognac. There were two: Perfection for $695 per glass and Talent for $1,090 per glass.

The point of Dan's entry wasn't to discuss the price of cognac or even the price of bread in Spain. Rather, it was to illustrate that while perfection is valued, talent is valued even more. I believe that is a point that most of us overlook far too often. Whether we're looking at a resume, evaluating an interview, or engaging in annual review, we focus on the faults of candidates and employees. In effect, we demonstrate to those that we hope to recruit and retain that we value perfectionism for we harp about their imperfections.

Yet successful organizations are not driven by those who make no mistakes. Why? Because those who make no mistakes are often unable or unwilling to make any decisions or take any actions lest they run the risk of being less than perfect. Successful organizations are driven by their stars. They're driven by those who have vision. Who are willing to take risks. Who are willing to accept short-term defeats in return for long-term successes. They're driven by talent. And that, folks, is why a glass of Talent costs $1,090 per glass.

Great discussion in the College Recruiter group at the Electronic Recruiting Exchange regarding whether employers should communicate rejections to candidates via phone, email, or some other method. If by phone, how many times should the employer call before leaving a message with their regrets. Is or should there be a difference in the communication method between candidates based upon their education or experience level?

Several of the writers have chimed in that there should be no difference in how candidates are contacted based upon their education or experience level, but I think that most of us would agree that that CEO candidates are rejected far differently than entry level candidates. Whether that should be the case or not is open for debate, but it seems to me that the way the rejection is handled should largely depend upon the organization's level of involvement with the candidate. If the candidate merely emailed a resume and wasn't even interviewed, then I believe that it is fine for the organization email a rejection. If the candidate interviewed with one person, then a letter (with a stamp -- yes, they still exist!) seems to be in order. But if the candidate went through multiple rounds of interviews, then it seems to me that the candidate's primary contact at the employer should call, leave a message asking for the candidate to call, and then break the news over the phone. If the two sides need to play phone tag a couple of times, so be it.

Candidates who go through multiple rounds of interviews and are then rejected through a simple phone message or email are unlikely to have much respect for the organization and they'll talk about their treatment with all of their friends and family. If the organization wants to be able to recruit the best candidates, it cannot afford to be bad mouthed in the community. Whether the employer's community is a small town or a big city, there are usually very few stars available to it so the employer must do everything that it can to successfully recruit and retain those stars. And sometimes that means treating those who are rejected with some respect.