By Jeff Westover
Steve Young practically delivered his own eulogy when he retired
from the National Football League recently.
For more than ninety minutes, Young reflected upon a career of observations
as one of the best football players in the world. He explained everything
he loved and would miss about the game. He thanked a cast of thousands
for their support. He told endearing stories about himself while never
once appearing anything less than humble and sincere. Many others
took their turn at the microphone in praise of Steve Young. And not
since the passing of Old Yeller was a scene so touching.
It was a masterful performance. He retires with gobs of money, adoring
fans from within and without his industry and all the time in the
world to do what he wants. He has worked and retired exactly the way
we all want to someday. And he retired like most of us never will.
Retirement Just Ain't What It Used to Be
Just as the single-company career has gone by the wayside, so too
has the reality of retirement. Experts say that the advances in medical
technology will prolong lives-and postpone retirement. According to
the 2000 Retirement Survey from the Society of Human Resource Management
a man retiring today can expect to live to age 81, women-to age 84.
But within just a few decades, projections for life expectancy call
for people living to age 100 to be far more common than it is today.
And that means the workers of today that will benefit from such technology
are preparing for far too short of a retirement period.
This is not lost on all workers. Nearly half of all workers surveyed
said they expected to work well beyond age 65, unlike most in generations
past. And some, nearly 4 percent, said they would likely never retire
at all.
But what is most surprising in this age of stock options and broad
awareness of investing is how few people are actually saving at a
pace that would sustain them after giving up full time careers. More
than four in ten full time workers have accumulated less than $50,000
towards retirement and over 10 percent have saved nothing at all.
Lights Are On, But Nobody's Home
Retirement is a relatively late 20th century idea anyway.
A worker from the year 1900 could expect to live into his 70s and
would likely work most of that time. If age or medical conditions
warranted removal from the workforce, the network of family and grown
children was expected to provide. The societal standards of the time
did not provide for modern ideas of Social Security or 401k plans.
But experts warn of a time in the next 30 years where the crisis
of elder care will reach epic proportions. Families of the late 20th
century are nowhere near the size they once were. And standards have
changed within society to the point that caring for the elderly will
fall to institutions because families either do not exist or are not
organized to handle the need from within.
Aging babyboomers are a crisis waiting to happen. More than 50 percent
of the workforce belongs to this age group and will be retired within
20 years. A great deal of attention is generated by the challenge
of replacing these people in the workforce. But the greater concern
is what will happen to them once they get out. Many foresee the lines
at the old folks homes to be worse than the department of motor vehicles.
A New Perk: Adult Day Care
Employers even today see and deal with this growing problem. According
to a recent Hewitt Associates survey, eldercare benefits have increased
100 percent in the last six years. These benefits include resource
and referral services, long-term care insurance, counseling and adult
day care.
Nevertheless the demands of being a caregiver and a full time worker
strain those managing a career. According to a MarketFacts study in
May 2000, 70 percent of caregivers who work full time give up personal
time, 55 percent sacrifice time with friends, more than half shirk
home responsibilities and six in ten take time away from spouses,
children and family.
No matter how great or small the demands of individual circumstances,
eldercare is affecting job performance too. Over half of those surveyed
reported missing time at work due to their situation and nearly a
quarter had lost pay or suffered a reduction in working hours to meet
the needs of their retired family.
What to do About It
Retirement looks to be a long ways off for workers in their 20s or
30s. But a dependence upon existing government programs or even employer-sponsored
plans is a recipe for disaster. Retirement is more than just money,
and it includes the care of more than just one. Here are some things
to consider:
- Confirm the trends. Make it a discipline to study current events
and legislation that impact retiring workers, savings and health
and elder care. Be aware of what is going on.
- Plan for more than just money. Money will buy a lot but without
advance plans it clearly will not buy space in eldercare facilities
of the future. The time to establish relationships for care in
that time of your life is now.
- Meet with family and children to discuss what can be done. Work
with attorneys and investment counselors in developing a strategy
to boost retirement savings and to stretch retire fund disbursement.
Steve Young likely has his retirement ducks in a row. He certainly
has the money and the time to develop a plan for when he no longer
has the ability to scramble without the aid of a walker. But the rest
of us will not have the luxury of facing retirement at age 38. And
if we wait until that day comes, we may be faced with a horror that
the likes of Steve Young would never know.
-- Jeff Westover is a writer based in Salt Lake City, Utah and Managing
Editor of JobMarketReport.com.