One thing I’ve learned this summer in my attempts to get started as a writer is how to construct a query letter. A query letter essentially is a pitch to an editor about an article that you’d like to write. You give them some bio information, your idea for the inner workings of the story, why you’re the right guy or gal to write the story, etc.
Doesn’t sound too complicated, right? I don’t think it is. But it is very strict, very regimented, very there-is-really-only-one-way-to-do-it—at least if you want to do so professionally and be taken seriously. Which has been my aim.
Two weeks back I queried the editor of an entertainment magazine about doing a piece on an up and coming entertainer. We’ll call the entertainer Suzie.
The editor responded, “You’re query was great. And it’s good to know that we’ve got a guy in Philly. Unfortunately, we only assign profile pieces to our staff writers. However, if you’d like to write it on spec, you’re more than welcome to send it on over for consideration.”
On spec means that if they like what you wrote, then they’ll buy it. Not before. They want to see it first. In other words, you don’t get paid as a writer-on-assignment. There’s a chance that your article won’t get accepted and you won’t get paid at all. It’s all a matter of show-me-what-you’ve-got.
For me, this was a good thing. A great thing. This is how it starts.
My next step was to contact Suzie to convince her to set up an interview. So I did. I emailed her and said that I wanted to do a piece on her and her upcoming show in the area. The piece would be a bit of an interview, a bit of a review.
I waited a day. In that timeframe, Suzie’s people contacted the magazine about me. Later that day I got an email from the editor. “I did not assign this article to you. I said we would look at it on spec. You DO NOT ever say you are an X reporter. DO NOT contact people under the pretense of an X writer. This does not speak well on your character.”
Oddly enough, that didn’t bother me. Not a bit because I disagreed with what he said. I thought he misunderstood what had happened. So I emailed him back and forwarded the exact language of the email that I sent to Suzie about the interview. It read, “Hello there. My name is Zack and I’m going to write an article for X and I’d really like to set up an interview with you…”
See, it’s tough. I thought what I said was legitimate. I still do. My name is Zack? It is. I’m going to write an article for X? That’s the whole idea. I’d really like to do an interview? That was also correct. I never explicitly said, “I’m an X reporter.”
Lost in translation I guess. My aim wasn’t to swindle Suzie or the magazine—my aim was to land the interview, write a damn fine article, and get published. I finished my response email telling the editor that despite everything, I still want to do this article and I’m determined to get published.
***** I wrote everything before this point on a Greyhound bus earlier today. I have since gotten home and checked my email.*****
I opened up my email account just now. There was a response from the editor. He said, “Point taken. I look forward to seeing the article.”
Not too shabby, huh? So, Suzie. About that interview?!
Check out my book. Tales of a True American: The Legend of Badass Kyle Lewis 2003-2006.
http://www.lulu.com/content/366324