CollegeRecruiter.com Insights by Employers Blog


Search Jobs

What: job title or keywords

Where: city, state



Search Content

Career-related articles, blogs, videos, podcasts, and more.





Do you have a question or comment?




ABOUT SSL CERTIFICATES
CollegeRecruiter.com has tens of thousands of pages of career-related articles, blogs, videos, podcasts, and other content. To find the information that you want, enter one or more keywords into this search engine:


And for our 900th EmployeeScreenIQ Blog post we have IRONY! When we started blogging many years ago we wrote a lot about the failures of FBI background screening. Well today, for our monumental 90oth post, the story has been written for us!

Fired Due To Error In Background Check, Carroll Woman Still Jobless

Eschol Amelia Studnitz lost her $58,000 accounting job July 31 because a government background check deemed her "unsuitable" for a low-level security clearance. She was stunned. She had no criminal record.

"I kept thinking, 'What could I have done?' " said the 59-year-old Carroll County resident, who goes by the name Amy.

Her shock was warranted: Her firing was based on a mistake. And within days, her employer, Corporate Mailing Services of Arbutus, heard from the Social Security Administration that she could, in fact, work on a new contract handling mail for the agency.

But three bewildering months after her dismissal, Studnitz has not been rehired or found other work in this tight job market. A single woman who's relying on her $405 weekly unemployment checks, she says she is behind on the mortgage for her Manchester home and has a shut-off notice from Baltimore Gas and Electric Co.

"I'm in a jam, a real jam," she said, "and I didn't do this to myself." She wants to regain the job she landed in April 2008, but the company now says it won't rehire her due to supposed performance shortfalls. She would like to sue the government for thousands of dollars of lost income, but could face long odds.

More


Article by, Jason Morris and courtesy of EmployeescreenIQ


Getting to the Offer

Hiring employees is the single most critical aspect of recruiting. Poorly handled, the whole thing could blow up faster than you can imagine. What could be worse than getting to a job offer and having the candidate say no thanks.

Reason for the No

There are a few common reasons why a candidate might say no,

The good news is that much of this can be handled or avoided with proper planning and screening.

Elements of a Good Hiring Process

The following are elements of a good offer/hiring process.


  1. Quick Selection Process

  2. Expedient Salary Negotiation

  3. Submit Offer Letter

  4. Clear Pre-Employment Process

  5. Professional Onboarding Process

It does not have be a fast process. What it needs to be is predictable. This means you need to lay out for the candidate the time frame and meet that time frame. When is the decision going to be made? Once made, when does the offer letter come? How long to take a physical and/or drug test? To the extent that you can meet the time line as described, it will inspire confidence in the candidate that this is just your process.

Other Ideas

Once the time and resources have been invested in making a hiring decision, often times it comes down to a couple small items. As I mentioned earlier, too many times I've seen things blow up for the smallest of reasons. Without exception, once the damage is done, it can't be repaired.

For example, we had a client who spent 3 months interviewing candidates until they found someone that was perfect. The sticking issue was a start date. The candidate had a bonus due in 30 days and wanted to make sure there was enough time to transfer his responsibilities to another person. He really needed the 30 days to transfer his responsibilities.

The client offered a signing bonus in their offer letter and asked him to start in the traditional 2 weeks. When they consented to the 30 days, they withdrew the signing bonus because they said it was in lieu of the bonus he was not going to get. This connection was not specifically spelled out in the offer letter.

The mistake the client made was not listening to the candidate. He needed the 30 days to make sure his responsibilities were properly transferred. It was a matter of integrity, a great quality for an employee. Instead they focused on the bonus money.

The Big Picture

In the end, they spent 3 months of time and resources interviewing dozens of candidates only to lose their prize candidate because of a difference of 10 working days.

The lesson here is when the deal comes down to finally hiring employees, don't lose sight of the big picture. I does not mean you have to roll over on everything but make sure you understand what is important to a candidate.

Final Thought

There is one last part of the hiring employees process. Once you have made the offer, it is accepted and your candidate has passed all the conditions of employment, don't forget about the candidates who did not make the cut. Send them a rejection letter letting them know of your decision. Nothing fancy but it should be professional. This just ties up all the loose ends and makes you company stand out from the rest!


Tom Tassinari.jpgAfter 20+ years as an engineer in the R&D world, Tom Tassinari found himself in the recruiting world. By adapting the problem solving and process discipline skills of engineering to the recruiting world, he now works with companies on locating and hiring top talent...with his own techie twist.


As practically everyone in the world now knows, last week talk show host David Letterman publicly admitted that he has had sex with "women who work for [him] on the show."

Background

Click here to see Letterman's on-air remarks, courtesy of CBS.

One comment Letterman made that has grabbed the attention of employment lawyers and HR gurus is that he hopes to "protect [his] job." He has a right to be concerned.

Most companies have policies that restrict boss/subordinate relationships. According to sources, CBS -- like many employers -- has a policy requiring disclosure of such relationships in an effort to avoid conflicts of interest. It reportedly states:

Continue reading "Lessons from Letterman" »


How Not to Get Sued by the EEOC

Want to avoid being a defendant in an EEOC lawsuit?

One of the easiest ways to find out what's on the EEOC's radar is to keep tabs on the lawsuits it's filing. Here's the latest, all from just the past week:

1.7 Million Reasons to Prevent Harassment and Retaliation

Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse agreed to pay $1.72 million to settle allegations of "rampant" sexual harassment in Longview, Washington store.

Two men and one woman alleged that they were subjected to "widespread and repeated" sexual harassment by managers and co-workers, including verbal abuse, sexual assault and promises of a promotion in exchange for sex. The EEOC contended that Lowe's failed to take prompt remedial action and instead fired the three alleged victims.

Continue reading "More Ways to Avoid an EEOC Law Suit" »


Stereotyped Statements As Discrimination Evidence.

Employment decisions based on stereotyping can be illegal.For example, comments suggesting that "women should be home with children instead of working", or that "Hispanics are lazy", or that "older workers can't adapt to change" -- can be used as proof in discrimination lawsuits and sometimes are.

I wrote recently about the case of Chadwick v. Wellpoint. In that case Laurie Chadwick, the mother of four -including a set of triplets -- was denied a promotion because she had "too much on her plate." It's an example of a fairly typical case in which we see gender stereotyping at play.

There was no evidence that Ms. Chadwick's family obligations were actually interfering with her work. Rather, her superiors simply assumed this would occur. The court in Chadwick v. Wellpoint stated: "the assumption that a woman will perform her job less well due to her presumed family obligations is a form of sex-stereotyping and ... adverse job actions on that basis constitute sex discrimination."

What we haven't seen much of -- in fact, haven't seen any of -- are cases in which evidence of gender stereotyping has been used to prove discrimination against a man - certainly not a man who has been accused of sexual harassment.

That's why the new case of Sassaman v. Gamache from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals is so interesting and important. Continue reading ...


Guest post by attorney Ellen Simon, who has been listed as one of The Best Lawyers in America for her landmark work representing individuals in precedent-setting cases. Ellen blogs at the Employee Rights Post.


george lenard.png Article courtesy of George Lenard, the originator of George's Employment Blawg, has over twenty years of experience in all aspects of labor and employment law, including preventive law as well as litigation. His special interests include employment discrimination, sexual harassment, and noncompetition agreements. He is currently a managing partner with Harris, Dowell, Fisher & Harris, L.C., in St. Louis, Missouri, and lives in the suburb of University City with his wife and family.


Another company is in the news because a former employee allegedly found it easier to take clients' money instead of investing it as promised.

Firm pays $2M for bad hire

Man accused of rape, embezzlement

http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1174955

This employee allegedly had over $400,000 in debts before he was hired, a fact easily identified within seconds after running a credit report, which costs about the same as lunch at Applebee's.

And a more comprehensive background check, one that includes education and employment verifications, a criminal records search, a motor vehicle report plus a credit check? Roughly a single day's pay. If the new hire is a financial advisor handling millions of dollars of client assets, a background check probably costs the same as one hour of their salary.

We have seen more stories about embezzlement these days. My colleague blogged on another example just last week. It's saddening but not surprising to see companies get burned because they do not background checks. And while there is FAR more awareness of the need to conduct employment screening compared to 10 years ago, many organizations still have a ways to go in terms of reducing their risk and evaluating potential damage.

Consider this company. It's not only the out of pocket cost to investors this financial services firm has to contend with. There's the hidden expense as well. Current and potential investors who may leave track marks sprinting in the other direction. When all is said and done, this will cost far more than $2 million dollars. It's too bad so much money could have been saved by spending so little in advance.

Article by, Kevin Bachman and courtesy of EmployeescreenIQ


As noted in a previous article I wrote on Recruiting Trends on the use of social networking sites such as Facebook or MySpace for employment, recruiters and employees should exercise some caution before they simply assume that everything on the web is fair game. There are substantial issues yet to be resolved, such as the impact of information that may be discriminatory to use, privacy interests, protection of legal off-duty conduct, and authenticity and identity. This is an evolving area of law that is still waiting for lawsuits to wind their ways through courts resulting in published judicial opinions. A federal court opinion that appears to be the first published decision that deals with the issue of utilizing a social networking page to deny a consumer an opportunity was rendered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on December 3, 2008. Although this decision involved issues surrounding the awarding of a degree and does not deal with private employers, the case may contain important lessons for employers and recruiters.

In that case, a would be teacher named Stacy Snyder sued administrators from Millersville University alleger that her freedom of speech was violated because material on her MySpace page was viewed, with the eventual result that Snyder was not able to complete a student teaching requirement and therefore did not receive an educational degree needed for a teaching certificate in Pennsylvania.


Continue reading "Stacy the "Drunken Pirate" - a Federal Court Case in the MySpace Age" »


What do a couple billionaires, a former President Clinton confidant, a retired appeals court justice, Las Vegas casinos and five NFL quarterbacks have in common? They all invested in a company called "Pay By Touch" led by a man named John P. Rogers. The company was supposedly developing biometric authentication technology that could be used to generate financial transactions through thumb print identification.

Now, all of these people have another thing in common: their millions of investment dollars have been squandered away by the company and its top executive. What's worse, it's not the first time John Rogers has done this. The San Francisco Chronicle reports that he did the same thing with a company in Minneapolis several years earlier. They also documented a laundry list of illegal, unethical and irresponsible behavior perpetrated by Rogers since 1999.

According to the report, "Rogers 'had a common name, and he never claimed to have done anything special before,' the former insider said. Only 'minimal' background checks were performed, he said."

Read the Full Story

Sounds like quite a few people need a refresher course on how to conduct a proper employment background check.

So exactly what could the company and its investor have found out about Rogers from a simple background check?

  • A Criminal Record Search would have revealed convictions for disorderly conduct, physically abusing his girlfriend, trashing another girlfriend's house
  • A Civil Record Search would have at least revealed a $35,000 civil judgment against him for failing to repay a loan
  • A Credit Report would have at least revealed $30,000 in liens for failure to by state income taxes in 1996.
  • A Substance Abuse Test might have revealed a dependence on alcohol and drugs.

If I were an employer or investor of this companys', each of these items might have given me pause for concern. When grouped together, there is no way I would have gotten involved. And if someone would have been willing to spring for the $100 background check, perhaps that company wouldn't have lost more than $340 million in venture capital.


Background

I have frequently written and spoken on legal issues relating to the use in employment decisions of applicant and employee Internet activity such as blogging and using social network sites. However, this is a novel legal issue, and as is usually the case with such issues, legal "experts" like myself have been forced to make educated guesses as to how these issues might be decided by the courts.

This situation is now changing, as courts are beginning to rule on these issues. A prime example is a recent federal court decision involving a high school teacher who was terminated because of his MySpace Activity.

For this blog's coverage of the issue, see:

Firing Bloggers Part IV -- More Bad Examples and parts I-III, linked in that post.
Employers Using Facebook for Background Checking, Part III and parts I and II, linked there.

The case is Spanierman v. Hughes, 3:06CV01196 (D. Conn. Sept. 16, 2008). In it, the federal court granted summary judgment to the employer, striking down the teacher's claims that he was denied due process,equal protection under the law, and his rights of freedom of speech and association by being terminated for having a decidedly unprofessional online relationship with his students. Read on for more details:

george lenard.png Article by George Lenard, the originator of George's Employment Blawg, has over twenty years of experience in all aspects of labor and employment law, including preventive law as well as litigation. His special interests include employment discrimination, sexual harassment, and noncompetition agreements. He is currently a managing partner with Harris, Dowell, Fisher & Harris, L.C., in St. Louis, Missouri, and lives in the suburb of University City with his wife and family.


iProfile.org, a free online CV, conducted an experiment during National Identity Fraud Protection Week (UK) which showed that job seekers are risking identity theft when sending their CV's to potential employers. iProfile placed an advertisement in the newspaper for a position with a fake company just to see how many applicants would forward their CV to the company without first checking that the company was legit. If certain keywords from the advertisement were searched online, it would take them to a web page which stated that the company was fake. According to Rick Bacon, CEO of iProfile, "We were shocked to find that 68% of people sent their CV into our fake job advert without doing any background checks first."

According to this article:

"Typically, criminals need just three out of fifteen key pieces of information to commit identity fraud - the average CV received as part of the experiment contained eight pieces of information. 61 CVs (57%) included a date of birth, despite this no longer being a requirement due to age discrimination laws, and 98 (91.5%) included a full address. A further 20 (19%) put others at risk by providing full details of references. One even included the applicant's passport number and national insurance details."

If this experiment tells us anything, it's that checking out the companies one is applying to is equally as important as companies checking out the applicants they are looking to hire. It's all about protecting oneself from a harm that could easily be avoided with a simple background check. Also, it wouldn't hurt to re-evaluate what information is included on the CV or resume. I really can't think of a good reason why any company would need your passport number...

Click here to read "iProfile.org warns job hunters to secure their CVs to protect against identity theft"

Article by, Natalie Beck and courtesy of EmployeescreenIQ


An applicant who was denied a job after disclosing that he was in the process of becoming a woman won a discrimination lawsuit against the Library of Congress.

The Facts

David Schroer served in the U.S. Army for twenty-five years, including a stint as a Special Forces Commander leading a team that tracked international terrorists. After retiring as a colonel in 2004, Schroer applied for a terrorism and international crime research position at the Library of Congress.

According to Schroer's attorney, Schroer received the highest interview score of all the candidates who applied for the position. He was offered the job in December 2004.

Before starting the job, Schroer had lunch with his new boss, Charlotte Preece. During lunch, Schroer disclosed that he was transitioning to become a woman named Diane. Schroer testified that after the disclosure Preece said, "Well, you've given me a lot to think about. I'll be in touch."

Preece then put a halt to the processing of Schroer's employment documentation. She then allegedly expressed concern about whether Schroer's "transitioning" would be a distraction and whether it would negatively affect his/her security clearance, contacts within the Army and intelligence community and ability to credibly represent the Library before Congress.

The next day, Preece called Schroer to inform him that the Library was withdrawing the job offer. Preece allegedly told Schroer that "after a long and sleepless night, based on our conversation yesterday, I've determined that you are not a good fit, not what we want." Preece then filled the position with a male applicant who had a lower interview score than Schroer.

Schroer sued, claiming gender discrimination in violation of Title VII.

Continue reading "Transgender Applicant Wins Discrimination Suit" »


Would you be surprised to learn that 1 in 10 job applicants lies to prospective employers about their education? employeescreenIQ recently released results from our 2nd quarter, 2008 study on falsification of academic credentials and found just that. Here are some other interesting findings:

High School diplomas were falsified more often than college degrees
Post Graduate and Doctoral degrees were the most infrequently falsified degrees
Applicants' false claims rarely involved an institution they never attended
What can employers do to insulate themselves from hiring people that lie about their education?

Conduct Education Verifications with the schools the applicants claims to have attended
Check the academic institution to see if it is known diploma mill. We just published a our List of Known Diploma Mills which can be downloaded for free by clicking here.

Click here to download the full release.

Article by, Nick Fishman and courtesy of EmployeescreenIQ


The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette launched a 9-month investigation into the backgrounds of registered Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletics Association (PIAA) referees and can you guess what they found? They discovered "dozens of officials had convictions involving child pornography, molestation charges, drug offenses and assaults, among other offenses." Surprising? No. Why you ask? Because there are still so many organizations out there that haven't jumped on the background check band wagon as evidenced by the stories you read on our blog every day. But I'll tell you what is surprising. The fact that PIAA representatives are quoted as saying they are generally satisfied with the process they have in place - that process being relying on those applying to officiate the sporting events to disclose their past criminal history. Our own Kevin Bachman wrote about background checks in Youth Sports and wasn't happy with what he saw.

To be honest, I really hope that process works out for them in the end. But the odds of that occurring are slim. Because all it will take will be one incident, one allegation and that process they are so satisfied with will be blown completely out of the water. And what will they have to show for it? A quote on the record stating they were "satisfied" with their current process even though this newspaper proved their so-called process was flawed and a sore backside from kicking themselves for their foolishness. Click here to read "Report Finds Dozens of PIAA Officials With Criminal Backgrounds"

Article by, Natalie Beck and courtesy of EmployeescreenIQ


The City of San Francisco has learned a very hard lesson over the last few months - that not running a background check can equal catastrophe in more ways than one! First, they hire a criminal to work in their IT department without conducting a background check (strike one!). Then, they fail to properly supervise him (strike 2!). Lastly, due to these swings and misses, this person was able to appoint himself ultimate ruler of the entire city's network by creating a super password - which only he has. And he's not sharing! (strike 3 - you're out!)

If the city had done its due diligence and ran a proper background check on this guy, they may have opted not to hire him and would not find themselves in the situation they now face. It may take them months, even years to discover all of the little devices and roadblocks this ex-employee built to make their lives as difficult as possible.

Score:

City of San Francisco: 0

Sneaky Techie: TBD

Continue reading ...

Article by, Natalie Beck and courtesy of EmployeescreenIQ


Maybe, according to a recent federal court decision.

The Facts

Allison Forrest, a bartender at Chili's in South Portland, Maine, and Mike Vashaw, a cook, began dating in 2003. Their relationship was rocky and often spilled over into the workplace. For example, after one of their early breakups, Vashaw allegedly arranged to have four women accost Forrest in the Chili's parking lot. Forrest complained to management and the company disciplined Vashaw. The couple then reconciled and continued their romance for several months.

Forrest and Vashaw broke up for good in 2005 when Forrest began dating another man. Forrest alleges that Vashaw immediately began to harass her with a vengeance. She filed three separate complaints with management in which she claimed Vashaw squirted her with hot water, gossiped about her with co-workers, refused to give her items she needed from the kitchen and called her derogatory names.

Investigations and Corrective Action

After the first complaint, Chili's promptly investigated and then issued Vashaw a verbal warning to "stop and behave as a professional" or "circumstances will take place."

Vashaw allegedly ignored the warning and continued harassing Forrest by calling her "b**ch" and "wh**e" in front of other employees.

When Forrest complained again, Chili's investigated and issued Vashaw a written warning threatening "immediate termination" if the "negative confrontations" didn't stop.

Vashaw then allegedly told Forrest that she was fat and needed to go to the gym. Forrest complained, Chili's investigated and then fired Vashaw.

Continue reading "Is an Employer Liable for Breakup-related Harassment?" »


Wage and hour claims continue to dominate the headlines . . .

Fastenal Pays $10 Million

Fastenal Co., a construction supply distributor, agreed to settle overtime claims for $10 million. Employees in California, Oregon and Pennsylvania alleged that the company improperly classified assistant managers as exempt, failed to pay overtime and violated meal period laws. The company denied any wrongdoing and said it entered into the settlement to avoid legal fees and the uncertainty/distraction of a trial.

Interwall Pays $1.7 Million

The California Attorney General reached a settlement with Interwall, a Southern California drywall company, for alleged overtime, meal-period and record-keeping violations. The company agreed to pay $1.4 million in damages, $200,000 in fines, $131,000 in back payroll taxes and nearly $100,000 in attorneys' fees and other costs.

Among other things, the company allegedly shifted employees among various corporate entities to avoid overtime as part of an effort to cut costs and underbid competitors. The company denied any wrongdoing.

The Lessons

Once again, one of the best ways to avoid big-ticket liability is to ensure that your company fully complies with all wage and hour laws. This is especially critical with exempt/non-exempt classifications, meal/rest period laws and record-keeping requirements. Courts (and plaintiffs' attorneys) continue to be very hard on employers where there's even a hint of impropriety.

As a starting point, check out our Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Cheat Sheet here or under the "Tools & Tips" section of the Blawg.

Mark TothArticle by Mark Toth, Chief Legal Officer of Manpower's North American operations, and courtesy of Manpower Employment Blawg. Mark also serve as Chief Compliance Officer and Vice President of Franchise Relations and serve on our Global Leadership Team, North American Lead Team, Executive Diversity Steering Committee and Sarbanes-Oxley Steering Committee.


Wage and hour claims continue to dominate the headlines . . .

Fastenal Pays $10 Million

Fastenal Co., a construction supply distributor, agreed to settle overtime claims for $10 million. Employees in California, Oregon and Pennsylvania alleged that the company improperly classified assistant managers as exempt, failed to pay overtime and violated meal period laws. The company denied any wrongdoing and said it entered into the settlement to avoid legal fees and the uncertainty/distraction of a trial.

Interwall Pays $1.7 Million

The California Attorney General reached a settlement with Interwall, a Southern California drywall company, for alleged overtime, meal-period and record-keeping violations. The company agreed to pay $1.4 million in damages, $200,000 in fines, $131,000 in back payroll taxes and nearly $100,000 in attorneys' fees and other costs.

Among other things, the company allegedly shifted employees among various corporate entities to avoid overtime as part of an effort to cut costs and underbid competitors. The company denied any wrongdoing.

The Lessons

Once again, one of the best ways to avoid big-ticket liability is to ensure that your company fully complies with all wage and hour laws. This is especially critical with exempt/non-exempt classifications, meal/rest period laws and record-keeping requirements. Courts (and plaintiffs' attorneys) continue to be very hard on employers where there's even a hint of impropriety.

As a starting point, check out our Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Cheat Sheet here or under the "Tools & Tips" section of the Blawg.

Mark TothArticle by Mark Toth, Chief Legal Officer of Manpower's North American operations, and courtesy of Manpower Employment Blawg. Mark also serve as Chief Compliance Officer and Vice President of Franchise Relations and serve on our Global Leadership Team, North American Lead Team, Executive Diversity Steering Committee and Sarbanes-Oxley Steering Committee.

Have you checked your kid's blog lately? The content could get you fired.

That was the big news story on WTMJ Channel 4 in Milwaukee last night. They had stories from parents who were fired, turned down for promotions, demoted, and more based on what their kids said about them on blogs.

And the blog quotes from kids were things like, "My parents are lazy alcoholics," "My dad does drugs," and other wonders.

Continue reading "Your kid's blog can get you FIRED" »

Over the past twenty years it has become painfully obvious that the majority of diversity initiatives fail to achieve their stated goals and objectives. The reason for this failure can be made obvious by reviewing a recent job description for a diversity consultant at a major law firm. The company wanted a high-level person who was capable of working with powerful attorneys to attract a greater diversity of staff into the company, reduce turnover of minority attorneys, increase involvement of affinity groups throughout the organization, develop and deliver multicultural sensitivity training to offices throughout the world and to help each office with their own unique diversity challenges.

Continue reading "Why Diversity Initiatives Fail" »

When it comes to making a professional career change, it is well agreed that tattoos (and for that matter, any other highly personal markings) are inappropriate to have in evidence. “And yet, many candidates still unknowingly reveal far too much of themselves as part of today’s information-intense society,” said Robert Graber, founder of the online recruiting site, WallStJobs.com.

Continue reading "When Looking For A Job, Watch Out For "Invisible Tattoos"" »

No doubt you've seen it because within four days of its appearing on the Net, everyone and their cousin was talking about 10 Things That Will Get You Fired. There were some items with which that I had painful, first-hand experience.

"That's not part of my job description" is not just a rudely smug expression. It's a statement that was very popular in the early 1980s. Apparently it's still alive and well. But to my dismay I recommended a secretary who found herself in need of a new position after the firm where we worked closed. Based on my recommendation to the partner of a nationally prestigious law firm, she was hired. I was glad for her because as we interacted at the previous firm, I found her to be a very capable, sensible person.

Continue reading "Bad News Practices" »

Recently my recruiting team had a bit of an upset with a candidate. The story regarding this individual lets me talk about something that I have wanted out there for a bit and is more that a little entertaining, so I figured I should share it.

Intro

This is how to NOT look for a new job. Some recruiters regularly advise job seekers to pursue their next position very aggressively, acting as their own agent. While this approach works and can be very rewarding, it is easy to get carried away and lose the critical element of mutual respect in the relationship. Very aggressive approaches can come across as pushy and annoying. Playing the role of recruiter for yourself is a delicate balancing game that you should not tinker with unless you are sure you are an excellent communicator and able to address concerns such as salary negotiation and arranging interviews on your own behalf.

Continue reading "How to NOT Get a Job: Respect in Recruiting" »

I've been in the professional placement and recruitment profession since 1973. I have personally placed more than 6500 professionals in just about every kind of job you can imagine... from the boardroom down to the maintenance person. 97% of the businesses in the United States employ less than a hundred people. The vast majority of these firms think that they are "people" organizations. They aren’t. They operate more like the individuals who run them (very disorganized) rather than as a "system" of business. Here are 10 of the most prominent myths of hiring that I have experienced in my tenure:

Continue reading "The Myths of Hiring" »

1. Coping strategies for how to deal with a job loss: The very first thing to do is to recognize that next to death of a spouse, death of a parent and death of a child coupled with divorce, the fourth most emotional thing that people do is look for a job. Just recognizing that losing a job, coupled with having to look for a job, is going to be an emotional strain is a step in the right direction. This is especially true for people who have been employed in their present job for five or six years or more. Psychologists agree that of all of these unfortunate life events, the loss of a job and the loss of a spouse seem to have the longest recovery periods.

In the present and future economy people are going to have to change jobs every two and a half to three years. It's no use to "curse the darkness." This is a reality.

The second thing to do is to recognize that you don't have control over what happens to you but you do have control over how you react to it. The issue isn't to deny the feelings but to recognize them, acknowledge them and get over them as quickly as possible. Too many times a long grieving period incapacitates a person's ability to get on with their life and look for a new job. Life isn't fair.... get over it... and get on with it.

The third thing a person might do is to express their feelings in absolute detail. A person should sit down and write out their feelings so that they can see them. Write to their heart’s content. Write until they're physically and emotionally tired of writing. Then read what they've written out loud as many times as they need to until they're downright tired of it. Some people even record what they have written down on an audio tape and listen to it over and over in the same way.

Continue reading "Moving forward after losing a job" »