CollegeRecruiter.com Insights by Employers Blog


Search Jobs

What: job title or keywords

Where: city, state



Search Content

Career-related articles, blogs, videos, podcasts, and more.



Mountbatten Institute
Click Here
Internal Revenue Service
New England Center for Children
Walmart
Weyerhaeuser
HCR ManorCare
University of Dreams
Bosch
College Pro
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Enterprise Rent-a-Car


Do you have a question or comment?




ABOUT SSL CERTIFICATES

« Hitting the Ground Running | Main | Do Your Online Video's Sizzle? »

Top 7 Mistakes Hiring Managers Make When Advertising Open Positions


Originally posted on George's Employment Blawg

There are plenty of reasons a particular job ad may not work well. Sometimes these mistakes are tough to recognize and even harder to learn to avoid.

Here are seven mistakes that can cause an ad to provide less bang for the buck than desired:

Not writing good ad copy

The key to writing good ad copy is to grab the job seeker's attention, give enough details about the position to make it clear what the candidate will be doing, keep job requirements brief, outline what makes the position and/or company special, make sure the ad is keyword rich, and make the application process simple.

  • Putting all your eggs in one basket
  • Why would you use just one advertising vehicle -- and always the same one? Monster & CareerBuilder are both great sites, but neither is ideal for all positions. Too often companies pick one job board and that is all they use -- regardless of the position.
    Bad idea, for many reasons. Often the position would receive a much better, more qualified response on a niche board. Or the position is such that a lot less money spent on a regional board would have gotten an equally good response.

  • Not tracking ROI
  • What's working? What's not? You don't need the latest applicant tracking system to track where responses are coming from. A simple job code, unique to each position and advertising medium, will allow you to track the source.

  • Recruiting reactively instead of proactively
  • Waiting for an employee to quit is the worst time to start an advertising and recruiting plan. Developing a comprehensive recruitment strategy before the need is urgent is the best way to effectively source and evaluate various avenues.

  • Not knowing your target audience
  • Where are they looking for jobs -- or are they even looking for jobs at all?
    This is an important question to answer in evaluating what advertising sites and/or publications make the most sense, as well as in deciding whether the extent to which a particular campaign should be focused on active or passive job seekers.
    (The term "passive job seeker" is an oxymoron -- it refers to a person who is not a job seeker, but could be persuaded to consider making a change.)

  • Not using the selected medium properly
  • Job boards want you to be happy with the responses to your postings and hope you make good hires. They want your money, so they want you to use them again.
    The major sites are constantly offering new products or enhancements. This presents a problem, as you need to keep up your knowledge of how they work to use them most effectively.

    For example, on CareerBuilder you are allowed up to three job classifications. If three are relevant, use them. Hotjobs uses a "short description" field that, when used properly, greatly enhances the search results placement of a posting, getting it in front of more eyes. Monster now offers auto-refresh postings to better increase the number of people that will see an ad.

  • Having a "set it and forget it" attitude
  • With an online posting, you have the ability to evaluate the early applications and massage the wording of the ad to better attract qualified candidates.

    Don't wait until the posting has expired and then say, "that didn't work." Figure out why something is not working early on in the process and adjust the ad copy accordingly.


    Article by, Thomas Torresson

    Article courtesy of the Recruiting Blogswap, a content exchange service sponsored by CollegeRecruiter.com, a leading site for college students looking for internships and recent graduates seeking entry-level jobs and other career opportunities.

    | | Subscribe to this RSS feed!

    2 Comments

    David said:

    About.com did a survey of HR professionls. They asked which of these top 10 job sites yeilded the best candidates. The Results:

    http://humanresources.about.com/gi/pages/poll.htm?poll_id=5763275227&linkback=http://humanresources.about.com/b/a/258241.htm

    I agree that niche job boards often get more qualified responses. Some of the large job sites will get you candidates who apply because it's easy to find and apply for jobs, even if they aren't suited.

    A niche job board is much more specific and in the best case builds a community of employers and recruiters who know what they want and candidates who are genuinely engaged in that niche. Employers and candidates need to opt-in to that niche. The result is more focussed job listings and more suitable candidates. That's better for both sides.

    Leave a comment

    Subscribe to Entry w/o Commenting

    Enter your email to be notified of new comments to this article.