-
Three ways to facilitate more live conversations with prospective college students
November 21, 2012 by William Frierson
Colleges and universities that are interested in enrolling more students to their schools may want to consider strategies involving live interaction.As I present the findings from the latest E-Expectations research with clients and colleagues, one of the areas that generates the most discussion is the apparent interest prospective students show in using Webcams and other tools to have live conversations with current students, faculty, and admissions representatives.
Continue reading:
Three ways to facilitate more live conversations with prospective college students
-
Get Your Game On! – Three Questions about Your Candidate Experience.
July 31, 2012 by William FriersonGame designer and TED presenter Jane McGonigal had an article in the January 22, 2011 WSJ “Be a Gamer, Save the World.” She states we (the royal We) spend three billion hours a week gaming. The average 18 year old spends 80 minutes a day gaming and extreme gamers spend up to 45 hours per week connected to a digitally delivered challenge. The quick lesson here is that engaging experiences hold our attention. The first question is: What kind of engagement does your candidate experience deliver?
Charles Handler, in his Candidate Bill of Rights suggests a candidate assessment should last no more than 30 minutes. Is that to free up time for gaming? Or is that because the assessments he is thinking about are a form of torture. Maybe he is seeking to limit the pain of a putting a candidate through poorly designed on-line assessments. He wants to limit (but not ban)– Applitorture. Or, the degree to which the applicant is subjected to mental or physical anguish from the act of applying for a job. Continue Reading
-
Candidate Experience – Make It Engaging and Interactive, Part 6 of 6
July 27, 2012 by William FriersonThis is part of a series connected to the Candidate Experience Monograph.
We asked job seekers to clarify their outlook for an interactive application experience two ways. In general, we wanted to know if there was a strong preference for engaging activities and if there was an expectation for interactive activities over text only experiences. The large number of neutral responses to a preference for interactive experience might indicate that candidates do not have enough exposure to job applications with this feature to have a strong opinion one way or another. However, the majority of job seekers have expectations that they will find a more engaging candidate experience than just reading about the job. Continue Reading

Please enter a Job Title and/or City.
